Open Government Initiative

The Open Government Initiative began on President Obama's first day in office when he issued his Memorandum on Transparency and Open Government. He summarized three principles that previous proponents for OGD had advocated for: the idea that government should be transparent, participatory, and collaborative. Following this statement, the State Department, after facilitating an online conversation between public employees and the public about their draft, published the Open Government plan using the Memorandum's three principles of transparency, participation, and collaboration.{{Cite web|url=https://www.state.gov/open-government-initiative/|title=Open Government Initiative|website=United States Department of State|access-date=2019-10-08}}

One of the earliest influences for the Open Government Initiative came from the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in 1966.Metcalfe, Daniel J. (23 May 2006). The Presidential Executive Order on the Freedom of Information Act (PDF). 4th International Conference of Information Commissioners. pp. 54–74. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-10-18. Retrieved 20 June 2013. Later, the Privacy Act Amendments of 1974 created the classically modern version of the FOIA under President Ford."Veto Battle 30 Years Ago Set Freedom of Information Norms: Scalia, Rumsfeld, Cheney Opposed Open Government Bill; Congress Overrode President Ford's Veto of Court Review". Electronic Briefing Book No. 142. National Security Archive (George Washington University, Washington, D.C.). 2004-11-23. The next notable change came in 1996 when the FOIA made each resource available electronically to the public."FOIA Update: The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. sect. 552, As Amended By Public Law No. 104-231, 110 Stat. 3048". Office of Information and Privacy, U.S. Department of Justice. Finally, the influences for the bill culminated with President Bush's signing of the OPEN Government Act of 2007, which was a philosophically similar act to the Memorandum given by President Obama in 2009."Public Law 110-175 OPENNESS PROMOTES EFFECTIVENESS IN OUR NATIONAL GOVERNMENT ACT OF 2007". Government Printing Office. 2007-12-31. Retrieved 2010-06-13.{{Cite web|url=https://www.opengovpartnership.org/stories/open-government-beyond-open-data-and-transparency/|title=Open Government beyond open data and transparency|website=Open Government Partnership|date=8 March 2013 |access-date=2019-10-08}}

Although not directly related to the idea of open government through technology, President Woodrow Wilson, during his term, aimed for "open covenants of peace, openly arrived at." In fact, the Ralph Bunche Library within the Department of State has been considering public input since 1789, alongside Secretary of State Rusk's Secretary's Open Forum from 1967.

As mentioned, the advocates for OGD typically fall within two schools: those who derive socioeconomic benefits from OGD in the belief that new competitors can penetrate the marketplace with access to government data and those who believe that is a social right that the general public has access to government data, public policy, and the decision makers of the latter using the former. The first school of thought is called the Open Government Data movement and the second school of thought is called the Right to Information movement. However, the two movements want access to different types of data; the Open Government Data movement is more interested in receiving quantitative data from government databases, whereas the Right to Information movement want access to qualitative documents and reports.

A core component of OGD is the belief that the public should have free access to information rather than having to request it. For example, the Freedom of Information Act only allows for public access when it is requested and thus takes several days to complete the order; journalists comprised 7.6% of those who requested information.{{Cite web|url=https://www.cjr.org/analysis/foia-report-media-journalists-business-mapper.php|title=Who files the most FOIA requests? It's not who you think.|website=Columbia Journalism Review|access-date=2019-10-09}}

The various forms of liquid democracy and public policy forums were created with similar beliefs as the Open Government Initiative. Similarly, Cloakroom, Change.org, Liquid.us, and Loomio were also created to facilitate public policy discussions and promote administration practices to become more accessible for the general public.

The most significant might be the Open Government Partnership, which after launching in 2011, now represents over 2 billion people. The countries within the partnership have agreed to execute the guidelines within the Open Government National Action Plans. The notable points from the plan include increased transparency from government spending, increased dissemination of information through electronic means, and greater accountability for political figures through tracked data.{{Cite web|url=https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/node/293751|title=Open Government Partnership|website=The White House|access-date=2019-10-08}}

The most recent form of Open Government legislation is the signing of the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act, making the OPEN Government Data Act from 2018 law. The acronym OPEN stands for Open Public Electronic Necessary. This law requires extensive data-keeping that is supervised non-partisan data officer. A review will be held in three years to determine whether agencies were properly maintaining their information and the usefulness of that information to the public.{{Cite web|url=https://www.fedscoop.com/open-government-data-act-law/|website=www.fedscoop.com|access-date=2019-10-08|title=The OPEN Government Data Act is now law|date=15 January 2019}}

There are a few common shortcomings that exist in regards to Open Government efforts.

The first is sustainability; many initiatives offer no revenue for the governments that attempt to make their data transparent to the public. For the data to become freely available, the associated government must make an initial investment into the infrastructure that would circulate the information. Because Open Data does not hold bipartisan support, funding is one of the main barriers to open governmental data.

The second is the fear that open data will only benefit those who can understand the information, which is typically those at the top of the socioeconomic hierarchy. Although in theory open data is meant to benefit the average citizen who is meant to feel more connected with their government's democratic processes, the information must composed in a way that is accessible.

The third weakness, thus, is the possibility that the information will be delivered in a way that is incomprehensible to the average citizen and can only be understood and applied by those already deeply familiar with governmental processes or those with the resources to access those who are familiar.

The fourth shortcoming stems from the philosophy of the Open Government Data movement in which open governmental data can lead to greater economic growth if used commercially. Once again, this shortcoming is related to the fear that only those already at the highest socioeconomic level will derive benefit from access to governmental data.{{Cite web |last1=Kitchin |first1=Rob |date=2013-11-27 |title=Four critiques of open data initiatives |url=https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/11/27/four-critiques-of-open-data-initiatives/ |access-date=2019-10-30 |website=Impact of Social Sciences |language=en-US}}

Typically, most countries with OGD initiatives provide their information through portals. Africa contains several national OGD portals with 4 countries (Morocco, United Arab Emirates, Ghana and Kenya) having generally robust access to information; however, these portals typically include specific sectors but not the government as a whole.{{Cite book|last1=Sayogo|first1=D. S.|last2=Pardo|first2=T. A.|last3=Cook|first3=M.|title=2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences |chapter=A Framework for Benchmarking Open Government Data Efforts |date=January 2014|pages=1896–1905|doi=10.1109/HICSS.2014.240|isbn=978-1-4799-2504-9|s2cid=34057732|chapter-url=http://eprints.umm.ac.id/46618/24/Similarity%20-%20Sayogo%20Pardo%20Cook%20-%20Benchmarking%20Open%20Government%20Data%20Efforts.pdf}}

India has a notable portal, but once again is limited in scope.

The European Data Portal consolidates many European countries that you can filter by sector, country, keyword, etc.{{Cite web|url=https://www.europeandataportal.eu/en/|title=Home page - European Data Portal - European Data Portal|website=European Data Portal|access-date=2019-10-09}}

The Global Open Data Index provides an overview of 94 countries' open data efforts and ranks them based on their coverage of certain key sectors.{{Cite web|url=https://index.okfn.org/place/|title=Place overview - Global Open Data Index|website=index.okfn.org|access-date=2019-10-09}}

The Open Data Barometer is another ranking site for open data efforts around the world, including 115 countries.{{Cite web|url=https://opendatabarometer.org/4thedition/report/|title=Global Report {{!}} Open Data Barometer|website=opendatabarometer.org|date=8 May 2017 |access-date=2019-10-09}}

The World Bank provides catalogues for open data across over 200 countries/jurisdictions.{{Cite web|url=https://data.worldbank.org/country|title=Countries {{!}} Data|website=data.worldbank.org|access-date=2019-10-09}}

• Open government
• Freedom of Information Act (United States)
• OPEN Government Act of 2007

{{Reflist}}

• [https://www.archives.gov/open Open Government at the National Archives]

Category:Obama administration initiatives

Category:Internet properties established in 2009

Category:Government services web portals in the United States

Category:Open data

Category:Open government in the United States