Talk:2014 Peshawar school massacre/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 20:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a great article. Will start the review soon. Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 20:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
- Pre Review Notes
I do my review with a main review, then a prose+source review to accompany it. Here is a good example: Talk:Global financial system/GA1
I'm already concerned with Talk:2014 Peshawar school attack#GA nomination as the person who stated this comment is completely right. An article must be stable to become a GA article. Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 20:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
:Good to have you as a reviewer. Thanks for quick response. UBStalk 20:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
:: First the "Reaction" section was formatted in bullets; now it becomes a table. --George Ho (talk) 01:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
::::There were different categories in that section which needed to arrange in a format format. Table looks better than bullets. UBStalk 04:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
:::Non-reviewer commentary: If the reaction section keeps getting large why not create another article for reaction. For example Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting has a separate article for reactions. As there were many reactions from governments around the world editors decided to copy the list to another article and turn existing list to a prose. If not this article will keep getting bigger and bigger making it difficult to read. Reactions section is the largest section in this article.--Chamith (talk) 04:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
::::Agree. I'm going to create it. --Saqib (talk) 14:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
:::As another Non-reviewer comment, surely it's much too early for this article to be considered sufficiently stable to meet the GA criteria? Nick-D (talk) 03:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
::::Non-reviewer comment I support Nick-D and MrWooHoo on the stability criteria. I can't see how this could be considered stable enough in the near future. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 10:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
:::::Non-reviewer comment I agree. The article is still unstable till the investigation is complete et al. Hence, it is too early to try and push for a GA. I think maybe a few months would let it cool down before it can hit GA. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" |
| valign="top"
! width="30" | Rate ! width="300"| Attribute ! | Review Comment |
| valign="top"
| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: {{GATable/item|1a|?|See prose review. }} {{GATable/item|1b|y|Lead should be expanded a bit, layout is good, no buzz words, etc. }} |
| valign="top"
| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}: {{GATable/item|2a|?|See source review. }} {{GATable/item|2b|y|All sources are reliable. }} {{GATable/item|2c|y|All information in article is cited. }} |
| valign="top"
| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: {{GATable/item|3a|y|It seems to cover all aspects of the topic. }} {{GATable/item|3b|y|No in-depth unnecessary detail that I've seen. }} {{GATable/item|4|y|Article is NPOV. }} {{GATable/item|5|n|The article is very recent, and there have been plenty of vandalism, etc. Please see this page for a more in-depth wording/definition. }} |
| valign="top"
| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: {{GATable/item|6a|n|File:Peshawar_child_attack_Quran_reading.jpg and File:Girls-mourn-peshawar-ap.jpg are both non-free. Please either change the rationales or delete them from the article because it is copyrighted. }} {{GATable/item|6b|y|Relavant images w/ suitable captions. }} {{GATable/item|7|n|From other users and myself, this article is too unstable and too recent to become a GA. Try renominating in about 2-3 months. Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 19:15, 26 December 2014 (UTC) }} |