Talk:Borman Expressway
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=GAN
|action1date=18:43, 16 April 2007
|action1link=Talk:Borman Expressway#GA
|action1result=listed
|action1oldid=123314877
|action2=GAR
|action2date=23 January 2010
|action2link=Talk:Borman Expressway/GA1
|action2result=kept
|action2oldid=339573947
|action3=GAR
|action3date= 05:54, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
|action3link=Talk:Borman Expressway/GA2
|action3result=delisted
|action3oldid=
|currentstatus=DGA
|topic=Engtech
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject United States|IN=yes}}
{{WikiProject U.S. Roads|type=I|state=IN}}
{{WikiProject Chicago}}
}}
GA
This article is well written, it has a well written lead, and it's broad in its coverage. It also has reliable references from InDOT and citations throughout the article, therefore I'm passing the article. -- JA10 T · C 01:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
:I disagree, but I don't care to find and follow the process to remove GA status, so I'll leave it. --NE2 03:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
::It is a bit short, but the road is only 12 miles long. It seems to be well cited and content complete. —Rob (talk) 03:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
:::The writing is pretty choppy, and the reason for the renumbering is unsourced. The route description could definitely be expanded, and I have a hard time believing that's all that can be written about the history. --NE2 03:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
USRD GA audit
Self-published sources
There are two in use in this article. They need to be replaced. As high of esteem as we old various roadgeeks and their person websites, they are still self-published and fall outside of policy and the GA criteria. If not resolved in a reasonable time period, this article will have to be de-listed as a GA. Imzadi 1979 → 01:17, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
:Thak you, {{user|Detcin}} for fixing this. Consider the issue resolved. Imzadi 1979 → 02:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)