Login
Login

Talk:Education in Wales/GA1

GA Review

{{atopr

| status =

| result = SyntheticSystems hasn't responded to my message from a month and a half ago and appears to have given up editing.--Llewee (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Education in Wales/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Education in Wales/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SyntheticSystems (talk · contribs) 20:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

:I don't believe alt text on images is necessary (although it is always desirable) under the Good Article critera. Only Featured Articles are required to follow all elements of the MoS. Robminchin (talk) 20:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

:{{u|SyntheticSystems}} Hi, what do you feel needs changing in the article?--Llewee (talk) 09:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

::I think you may need page numbers for some of the references and the history section needs to have at least a paragraph, maybe two. SyntheticSystems (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

:::{{u|SyntheticSystems}}, the history section has several subsections with multiple paragraphs each. I think the documents cited do largely have page numbers when specific pages are used. With the exception of a couple I didn't add and don't have access too.--Llewee (talk) 15:14, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

=Criteria=

Good Article Status - Review Criteria

{{see|WP:WIAGA}}

A good article is—

  1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

    2. : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1a}}; and

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1b}}. Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.

  2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

    3. : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2a}};

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2b}};Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

    : (c) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2c}}; and

    : (d) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2d}}.

  3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

    4. : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3a}};This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics. and

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3b}}.

  4. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.

  5. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.
    6. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.

  6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:
    7. Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

    : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6a}}; and

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6b}}.The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

=Review=

  1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

    2. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (prose)Prose is good.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}
    (b) (MoS)No MoS violations.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

  2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

    3. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (references)References match up what is in the article but some references need page numbers.{{GAHybrid/item|hold}}
    (b) (citations to reliable sources)All statements are sourced.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}
    (c) (original research)No original research.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism)No plagiarism.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

  3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

    4. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (major aspects)All major aspects are covered.{{GAHybrid/item|hold}}
    (b) (focused)In-depth coverage.{{GAHybrid/item|hold}}

  4. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.

    5. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Notes !! Result

    Neutral.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

  5. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.

    6. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Notes !! Result

    No edit wars.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

  6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

    7. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)Images need alt text.{{GAHybrid/item|hold}}
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)Image placement is good.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

==Result==

class="wikitable"
ResultNotes
{{GAHybrid/item|hold}}Needs more improvements but is workable.

{{Abot}}