Talk:Wheeler Ridge Interchange

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}

|maxarchivesize = 150K

|counter = 1

|minthreadsleft = 1

|minthreadstoarchive = 1

|algo = old(365d)

|archive = Talk:Wheeler Ridge Interchange/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{Old AfD multi | date = 14 December 2015 | result = no consensus | page = Wheeler Ridge Interchange}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|

{{WikiProject U.S. Roads|state=CA|class=C|importance=low|needs-jctint=NA|needs-map=no|needs-kml=NA}}

}}

Future Interstate 9 Section

Shouldn't Interstate 9 be added in a Future section? It is the proposed redesignation of California 99. Allen (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

:Only if there are multiple reliable secondary sources for such a thing, not roadgeek websites tossing the idea around. Even if you have chambers of commerce or advocacy groups tossing the idea around, if they aren't taken seriously by the press, I wouldn't add it. Imzadi 1979 → 23:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)