Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farah Ejaz Baig

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Farah Ejaz Baig}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Farah Ejaz Baig}})

Non-notable advocate. Vice chairpersons of Punjab Bar Council are not inherently notable. Fails WP:GNG. HistoriesUnveiler (talk) 22:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock

Delete Not nearly enough notable sources. Slowtationjet (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

• Delete A 9 year old stub MNewnham (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, and Pakistan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per MNewnham. Lacks significant coverage. 41.100.198.103 (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: Per NLAWYER and GNG. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
• keep. Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN as Vice Chairman of state/province body Punjab Bar Council. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.107.27.30 (talk) 11:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: For more policy based input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

• Weak delete. Like Asrar-ul-Haq Mian, there is some news coverage about her election, but this is somewhat expected. WP:POLITICIAN is not applicable to a professional lawyer. 103.65.140.93 (talk) 10:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.