Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriella Fox

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

=[[Gabriella Fox]]=

:{{la|Gabriella Fox}} ([{{fullurl:Gabriella Fox|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriella Fox}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No reliable sources. No assertion of notability. Fails WP:PORNBIO, a bit part in Pirates II doesn't hack it. David in DC (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Although the article needs cleaning up, it now has the reliable sources and verifiable assertions of notability it once lacked. Unless anyone disagrees, I would be happy to see this AfD closed with the notation Article Rescued by Epbr123 and Hoang.pham19. David in DC (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —David in DC (talk) 23:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. David in DC (talk) 00:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. twirligigLeave one! ⋄ Check me out! 03:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Dismas|(talk) 20:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep per Epbr123. Dismas|(talk) 02:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep as a stub for this up and coming actressEsasus (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: Just a note that the "up and coming actress" is already retired. Heh. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO per award nom. Has also had coverage [http://avnmag.avn.com/articles/31833.html here], [http://avnmag.avn.com/articles/5258.html here], [http://www.avn.com/articles/30826.html here], [http://www.avn.com/articles/30381.html here], [http://www.xbiz.com/news/97522 here], [http://www.xbiz.com/news/video/95513 here] and [http://www.xbiz.com/news/news_piece.php?id=91330&mi=all&q=javors here]. Epbr123 (talk) 01:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Already retired, never notable.Valrith (talk) 02:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.