Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong International Airport Services Limited

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. Anybody who wants to merge it can do so. If disputed, the merge can be discussed on the talk page of the article. — CharlotteWebb 18:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Hong Kong International Airport Services Limited]]=

Seems to fail WP:CORP Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Major copyedit or merge into Dragonair. This article's content seems to revolve around the people in the corporation rather than the corporation itself. I agree that it does not have enough notability, but it does seem like a standard stub if the links to people and their business competitors are removed. however, if it is to be deleted, then at least this subsidiary should be listed in the main Dragonair article. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 11:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge per Mr. Tai or to Hong Kong International Airport. There's not enough substance in the article even to justify a stub. Bearian (talk) 18:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:*Comment I was going to say merge into HKG, but the nature of the article would probably only warrant maybe one sentence in the airport's structures section, in comparison to the Dragonair article it could elaborate the lounge's services and describe business partners in more than a sentence. But either way, this article needs to merge with one of these two articles. It fails WP:CORP pretty bad. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 18:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. Reliable, independent sources available for this subject (e.g. [http://classifiedpost.scmp.com/rscomdetails.php?lcid=HK.EN&comid=2966&comname=HONG+KONG+INTERNATIONAL+AIRPORT+SERVICES+LIMITED]) --Oldak Quill 23:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • that doesn't really look like it's independent: it seems to be an add. It also doesn't amount to sigificant coverage. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect The Baggage and cargo facilities section in the Hong Kong International Airport article is a good place for some of this content. The wholly owned subsidiary is not really notable independently of the airport that owns it. --NickPenguin(contribs) 02:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.