Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machamp

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 11:06, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

=[[Machamp]]=

Zero content, just a table with stats about a Pokemon trading card. Should be a speedy, but that only works if they turned the table into a template like they're supposed to. —Korath (Talk) 14:39, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep. It's not the card information, it's the game information, and it's also part of the string of all pokémon, not all of which have a full article yet. Should be marked as a stub. RickGriffin 23:30, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Aaaaaaaahh! Please start pokéwiki and transwiki all this (except one parent article with merges). Lots of people love the cards/cartoons/games/etc., including plenty of WP editors, but also see Wikipedia is not a repository of lists, and WP:FICT, and the not-quite-policy that Wikipedia is not a gamers' guide nor a repository of game rules. Barno 00:29, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, presumably passes the pokemon test. Kappa 00:46, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, tag for expansion. Meelar (talk) 01:26, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Pokemon Test. Klonimus 07:11, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • This isn't more notable than the average pokemon :) Radiant_* 10:22, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, more pointless pokecruft. --Bucephalus talk to me 15:09, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • There's no article here - just a table. Unless someone actually has something to write, delete. Wikipedia is not a repository of lists or raw data. Rossami (talk) 22:48, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge the few bits of relevant info to a list of pokemon. Surely you can't write an interesting story on all (hundreds) of them? Radiant_* 10:22, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - This page is part of a sequence of 387 pages in one part of the Pokémon project. Not all have been fully written out; those which haven't are marked as poke-stubs. This one was until a few hours before it was marked for deletion (according to the history), and it is again.User142 10:30, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete doesn't pass Pokemon test. Grue 18:50, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete trivial, nonnotable CDC (talk) 21:02, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. ✏ OvenFresh² 00:05, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, please see the lengthy debate on Wikipedia:Poképrosal about what to do about them. I suggest that this and other "PokeOrphans" remain in limbo until the proposal deals with them. Master Thief Garrett 05:09, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - Unfair use of VFD. Andros 1337 04:01, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

:This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.