Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaysia – United Arab Emirates relations

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 08:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Malaysia – United Arab Emirates relations]]=

:{{la|Malaysia – United Arab Emirates relations}} ([{{fullurl:Malaysia – United Arab Emirates relations|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaysia – United Arab Emirates relations}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

whilst noting they have embassies and are both Islamic countries, there is a distinct lack of coverage of actual bilateral relations, [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=malaysia+%22united+arab+emirates%22+-saudi+-singapore&hl=en&ned=us&scoring=r], there is a little bit of business dealings like [http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2007/04/13/afx3609288.html this] but not enough to make an article. the two countries cricket teams (which are considered 2nd tier) [http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/143427.html played in 2004] and I know of at least 1 editor that would think this equates to bilateral relations, clearly not. LibStar (talk) 07:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Comment. I'll bet that is a lot of trade, traffic and guest workers between these two Muslim nations, enough to generate reliable sources. There are [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Malaysia+UAE&cf=all 15,400 Google news hits for "Malasia UAE".] (I've generally agreed with LibStar's efforts to rid Wikipedia of these sorts of articles.) Abductive (talk) 07:43, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

: WP:GOOGLEHITS is not a valid reason. you will note much of those 15,000 articles is multilateral (ie any article that mentions these 2 countries + say Saudi Arabia, Singapore etc etc). LibStar (talk) 07:46, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

::I didn't say keep or delete, I just made a prediction. Abductive (talk) 07:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.