Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nindo Shaher

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 23:33, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

=[[Nindo Shaher]]=

:{{la|Nindo Shaher}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nindo_Shaher Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nindo Shaher}})

No evidence of notability, not a single reference at all. Article was PRODed and removed by IP 182.182.66.226 Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - if it exists then it's about equivalent to a Parish - which is enough to pass wp:NPLACE. The only question is whether it exists or whether it's a hoax. Neonchameleon (talk) 23:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

:*A quick Google search confirms that Nindo Shaher is a real place.[http://www.dawn.com/news/1101425] • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - Yeah, it exists and should be kept. However, the article needs cleanup. Faizan 16:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep per above rationale by Neonchameleon. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Definitely needs cleanup relating to sources and other aspects, although it seems notable. BenLinus1214 (talk) 03:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep because it is a real place as noted above. The article was extensively copied from [http://nindoshaher.wordpress.com/nindo-shaher/ this] website, so I removed the obvious copyright violations. I tagged for citations text I could for sources for but were not obviously copied. Performed a bit of cleanup. It's better but still needs more work. --I am One of Many (talk) 08:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.