Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeest (2nd nomination)

=[[Zeest]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeest}}

:{{la|Zeest}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zeest_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Zeest}})

removed PROD per WP:PROD. Reason for PROD (by User:discospinster) was "Article does not indicate how band is notable per WP:BAND. References are either self-published, blogs, or sources of unclear reliability (or link no longer works). Claims of being "censored" are backed up only by self-published sources."Illia Connell (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — sparklism hey! 12:34, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riley_Huntley/You_missed! Cheers,] Riley 00:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


  • Delete. As per nom. 1292simon (talk) 02:30, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (tc) 05:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


  • Delete per nom. JayJayTalk to me 04:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing found to indicate that an encyclopedia article is appropriate. --Michig (talk) 09:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.