Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 March 21#Category:Pakistani pulmonologists
= March 21 =
== Category:World Premiere Plaza ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:27, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|World Premiere Plaza}}
:Nominator's rationale: Main article Draft:World Premiere Plaza has been moved to draft space due to lack of sources. If Disney's plans come true, there will likely be sufficient sources in a couple of weeks, but for now we should probably delete this category. Chrisahn (talk) 23:27, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Category is empty. Could have been tagged CSD C1. Liz Read! Talk! 00:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Even with the one article (now in draft space), there's no reason for this category to exist. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:01, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Millennia in the future ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:25, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Millennia in the future to :Category:Time periods in the future
:Nominator's rationale: Contains only a single subcategory; I think the others were cut in previous CfD's. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:51, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. The centuries sibling category may be merged too. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:48, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- :Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_March_22#Category:Centuries_in_the_future. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:55, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Broadcasters of the Green Bay Packers ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:25, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|Broadcasters of the Green Bay Packers}}
:Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT; similar categories were deleted Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
::Delete per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 01:15, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep this is for current and past broadcast stations of the Green Bay Packers. Not sure how this falls into WP:PERFCAT but open to renaming. Got nominated for deletion even before I filled it! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, not a defining characteristic. The defining characteristic of these articles is that they are about media in Green Bay, and the articles are already categorized as such. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:52, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:People from Mölnlycke ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:25, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:People from Mölnlycke to :Category:People from Härryda Municipality
:Nominator's rationale: Category with just entry. Lost in Quebec (talk) 19:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: I note that a couple of articles (not more than five) in the parent :Category:People from Härryda Municipality would fit in this category. But I also note a somewhat overenthusiastic categorisation scheme for :Category:Swedish people (and other articles), where people may be categorised by land, by county, by province, by municipality, by populated place. I would say the populated place layer is better to keep than the municipality level generally; as many people were born before current municipalities (1960s and 1970s) came into play. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Woody Woodpecker film stubs ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Woody Woodpecker film stubs to :Category:Short animated film stubs
:Nominator's rationale: There are only two other articles in the "Woody Woodpecker film stubs" category... OpalYosutebito (talk) 19:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 00:54, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge :Category:Woody Woodpecker films contains just 14 articles. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:57, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Canadian socialists of Ukrainian descent==
== Category:Coke Studio (Pakistani TV program) ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Coke Studio (Pakistani TV program) to :Category:Coke Studio Pakistan
:Nominator's rationale: Seems to be the same category, but with different names --woodensuperman 11:18, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- Just delete, the category contains songs that weren't original Coke Studio songs. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
:
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- {{ping|Woodensuperman}} what is your thought about the alternative proposal? Marcocapelle (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- :Happy with a delete, it pretty much amounts to the same thing. I have to confess, I didn't look too closely at the songs, but if they're not WP:DEFINING then they shouldn't be included. --woodensuperman 17:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Cryptocurrency stubs ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Cryptocurrency stubs to :Category:Currency stubs
:Nominator's rationale: Underpopulated stub category. As always, stub categories require at least 60 articles in or under them, but this only had 23 articles in it when I first found it -- and after checking them and finding that several weren't even really stubs anymore, it now only has 17.
Further, cryptocurrency is one of those subject areas where Wikipedia is constantly battling self-promotional spam from every crypto evangelist and every new startup crypto exchange under the sun, so crypto-related articles see a higher than normal rate of spam deletion -- which means that even if 43 other cryptocurrency-related stubs could be found to populate this properly, it's still not at all clear that this would stay over 60 articles in any sustained or ongoing way, except perhaps if we could get it well beyond even 60 articles for cushioning room.
So the template is fine, as it can just upfile its entries into the parent category in the meantime, but there would need to be a lot more articles than this before a dedicated category was needed for them. Bearcat (talk) 21:55, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:39, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:University and college theatres in London ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:University and college theatres in London to :Category:University and college theatres in England
:Nominator's rationale: University and college theatres in London is a single-page category and thus appears to be WP:OCNARROW. I propose up-merging into just University and college theatres in England as the other parent category, Theatres in London by type, is a WP:CONTAINERCAT for types of theatre in London. University and college theatres in England currently has five pages and two categories (including the one proposed here for up-merger) so is not large enough to justify diffusion. Robminchin (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Creature actors==
==Sayfo==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Propose renaming :Category:Assyrian genocide to :Category:Sayfo
- Propose renaming :Category:Places of the Assyrian genocide to :Category:Places of the Sayfo
- Propose renaming :Category:People who died in the Assyrian genocide to :Category:People who died in the Sayfo
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-archivedtalk mw-collapsed " style="color:inherit; background: transparent; text-align: left; border: 1px solid Silver; margin: 0.2em auto auto; width:100%; clear: both; padding: 1px;"
|-
! class="{{main other|cot-header-mainspace|cot-header-other}}" style="{{main other|background:#F0F2F5|background:#CCFFCC}}; font-size:87%; padding:0.2em 0.3em; text-align:center; color:black;" |
|-
| style="color:inherit; border: solid 1px Silver; padding: 0.6em; background: var(--background-color-base, #fff);" |
- :Category:Assyrian genocide to :Category:Sayfo – C2D: Main article is Sayfo Mugsalot (talk) 09:46, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- :Category:People who died in the Assyrian genocide to :Category:People who died in the Sayfo
- :Category:Places of the Assyrian genocide to :Category:Places of the Sayfo
- Oppose speedy. It is far from obvious that the name Sayfo has gained a wide enough understanding to be immediately preferred to Assyrian genocide, making the move too controversial for speedy. This would benefit from a full discussion. Place Clichy (talk) 13:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- :Strong support. In favor of this proposal. Labeling it as Assyrian goes against C2D guidelines and raises other controversial issues. It also fails to address the complexity of the label. User623921 (talk) 10:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Place Clichy}} The names "Assyrian genocide" and "Sayfo" were discussed here and here. buidhe might be of some help. Mugsalot (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
:: {{Re|Mugsalot}} I'm just saying this is too sensitive and unclear for speedy, and I suggest a full discussion at CfD. On a wider note, these discussions (which are far from unanimous consensus) seemed to be mostly concerned by some belligerent editing we have seen in the past about the Assyrian name, to which some seemed to prefer other terms like Aramean (a debate strangely apparently internal to the Swedish diaspora). However, this often contentious back-and-forth editing seems to have calmed down a lot on Wikipedia lately, as seen e.g. here or here. Place Clichy (talk) 17:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
::: {{Re|Place Clichy}} fair enough let's do that - how do we do that? Mugsalot (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
:::: {{Re|Mugsalot}} I should have pointed you to WP:CFD#HOWTO which explains that, sorry. Place Clichy (talk) 18:53, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
::::: {{Re|Place Clichy}} no worries, I've done that now. Mugsalot (talk) 11:21, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. There are more mentions of the event as the Assyrian genocide compared to the event as Sayfo, and the event is generally referred to as the Assyrian genocide barring arguments for a Syriac, Aramean, or Chaldean label. Surayeproject3 (talk) 17:58, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support we got consensus to move the main article so the cat should move as well. (t · c) buidhe 15:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
{{Cob}}
Nominator's rationale: WP:C2D. Main article is Sayfo. Mugsalot (talk) 11:18, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Rename per nom. The article name has been stable for a long time, so anyone who has a problem with the name should start an WP:RM procedure. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Place Clichy|User623921|Surayeproject3|Buidhe}} pinging contributors to speedy discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
::I am strongly supporting a speedy renaming, I am also in favor for all three propositions:
::* Propose renaming :Category:Assyrian genocide to :Category:Sayfo
::* Propose renaming :Category:Places of the Assyrian genocide to :Category:Places of the Sayfo
::* Propose renaming :Category:People who died in the Assyrian genocide to :Category:People who died in the Sayfo
::User623921 (talk) 12:50, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
:::been 9 days without a WP:RM, is it safe to renaming the categories now? @Marcocapelle User623921 (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
:::* {{ping|User623921}} we need to wait for an uninvolved editor to close the discussion and to implement the outcome. Currently there is quite a backlog at this forum so this may take a while. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:1570s in Ottoman Syria ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|1570s in Ottoman Syria}}
:Nominator's rationale: This was previously kept at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_November_16#Ottoman_Syria, but its contemporary siblings were merged/deleted at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_March_8#16th–18th_century_Ottoman_Syria_categories, and it seems that this cat was omitted from that nomination as an oversight. Both member pages are already within both 157x establishments in the Ottoman Empire and {{c|16th-century establishments in Ottoman Syria}}, so no merger is needed. – Fayenatic London 11:01, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A merge is not needed since both articles are already in :Category:16th-century establishments in Ottoman Syria. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:40, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Argentinosaurus ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: delete. Liz Read! Talk! 09:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose deleting {{lc|Argentinosaurus}}
:Nominator's rationale: Pointless category for a monotypic taxon, and pointlessly populated with a different genus and the parent family. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:57, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Empty category. Liz Read! Talk! 16:54, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- :(Yes, sorry - I removed the abovementioned two genus and family articles. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC))
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Category:Events in Wikipedia history ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Events in Wikipedia history to :Category:Wikipedia culture
:Nominator's rationale: merge, the three subcategories have little in common except they are obviously part of Wikipedia culture. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
== Endings by decade until 1500 ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:24, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:0s endings to :Category:0s
:* Propose merging :Category:10s endings to :Category:10s
:* Propose merging :Category:20s endings to :Category:20s
:* Propose merging :Category:30s endings to :Category:30s
:* Propose merging :Category:40s endings to :Category:40s
:* Propose merging :Category:50s endings to :Category:50s
:* Propose merging :Category:60s endings to :Category:60s
:* Propose merging :Category:70s endings to :Category:70s
:* Propose merging :Category:80s endings to :Category:80s
:* Propose merging :Category:90s endings to :Category:90s
:* Propose merging :Category:100s endings to :Category:100s
:* Propose merging :Category:1480s endings to :Category:1480s
:* Propose merging :Category:1490s endings to :Category:1490s
:Nominator's rationale:merge, at least up to the year 1500 this is a redundant category layer with only one or two subcategories (deaths and/or disestablishments). This is follow-up on this earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:27, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
: {{ping|Aidan721|LaundryPizza03|Fayenatic london}} pinging contributors to previous discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:28, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Support for consistency with beginnings (see recent CFD). The deaths subcats now use {{tl|Decade births or deaths category header}}, thanks to {{u|Aidan721}}, and {{u|Pppery}} updated it after the last CFD. {{ping|Snævar}} you also tried to make changes – please let us know here if you found some cases where the template was not working. – Fayenatic London 10:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge all per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:38, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. I an understand why the year-level equivalents were not merged to decade level. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:56, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
==Category:Masked actors==
== Category:Algerian pulmonologists ==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
:* Propose merging :Category:Algerian pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists
:Nominator's rationale: Only 1 entry. Also merge with :Category:Algerian physicians
Also proposing to merge:
- :Category:Argentine pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Argentine physicians.
- :Category:Bangladeshi pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Bangladeshi physicians.
- :Category:Bolivian pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Bolivian physicians.
- :Category:Brazilian pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Brazilian physicians.
- :Category:Dutch pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Dutch physicians.
- :Category:Dutch pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Dutch physicians.
- :Category:Filipino pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Filipino physicians.
- :Category:Pulmonologists from Georgia (country) to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Physicians from Georgia (country)
- :Category:Greek pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Greek physicians.
- :Category:Hungarian pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Hungarian physicians.
- :Category:Israeli pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Israeli physicians.
- :Category:Kenyan pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Kenyan physicians.
- :Category:Kosovan pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Kosovan physicians.
- :Category:Lithuanian pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Lithuanian physicians.
- :Category:New Zealand pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:New Zealand medical doctors.
- :Category:Pakistani pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Pakistani medical doctors.
- :Category:Paraguayan pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Paraguayan physicians.
- :Category:Portuguese pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Portuguese physicians.
- :Category:Romanian pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Romanian physicians.
- :Category:Slovenian pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Slovenian physicians.
- :Category:Thai pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Thai physicians.
- :Category:Tunisian pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Tunisian physicians.
- :Category:Venezuelan pulmonologists to :Category:Pulmonologists and :Category:Venezuelan physicians. LibStar (talk) 01:55, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Dual merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:31, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Dual merge per nominator.Lost in Quebec (talk) 09:57, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep The rest of the medical community have their specialism and more will go in. A lot of these countries that are not well covered but have made significant contributions to this field. I don't see the reason or the merge. scope_creepTalk 08:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
:* Once more articles are added the categories can be recreated. Currently this is just hindering navigating between articles about pulmonologists. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
::Not really an argument for keep, the categories all listed above have only 1 entry and have been like that for sometime. LibStar (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
:::One of the main purposes of categories is to find similar articles. Having 1 entry is redundant. LibStar (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
----
:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.