Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tasos90

class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

= [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tasos90|Tasos90]] =

{{checkuser|Tasos90}}
{{checkuser|Lav90}}
{{checkuser|Taz300zx}}
{{checkip|122.108.211.141}}

Code letter: F

First, User:Tasos90 was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ATasos90 blocked] by B for "Continues to upload nothing but copyvios, a month after "final warning". May be unblocked contingent on agreeing to stop violating copyright policy and have uploads vetted before submitting them." In part at Brisbane.
Second, User:Lav90 continued reverting at Brisbane, was blocked (and unblocked) for User:Seicer for the continued copyright violations. I then [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ALav90 blocked] User:Lav90 for continuing to revert at Brisbane.
User:122.108.211.141 followed soon after. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3A122.108.211.141 blocked] for only 12 hours (IP address clearly).
User:Taz300zx then followed and I again [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ATaz300zx blocked].

Is there a common IP address or some other way to stop this or should I just protect Brisbane until he gets bored? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

:: The following are {{confirmed}}:

::# {{checkuser|Tasos90}}

::# {{checkuser|Lav90}}

::# {{checkuser|Taz300zx}}

:: Dynamic range, unfortunately. Protection may be viable. Didn't see any obvious sleepers, but feel free to ask for further checks as needed. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

::{{clerknote}} Blocked & Tagged. Tiptoety ^talk 14:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.