:Catinat-class cruiser

File:'Italia,' first class ironclad of the Italian Navy LCCN2003672917 cropped.jpg {{ship|Italian ironclad|Italia||2}}, the threat of which prompted the French naval program of 1890]]

In the late 1880s, the Italian {{lang|it|Regia Marina}} (Royal Navy) accelerated construction of ships for its fleet and reorganized its most modern ironclad battleships—the {{sclass|Duilio|ironclad|5}} and {{sclass|Italia|ironclad|4}}es—into a fast squadron suitable for offensive operations. These developments provoked a strong response in the French press. The Budget Committee in the French Chamber of Deputies began to press for a "two-power standard" in 1888, which would see the French fleet enlarged to equal the combined Italian and German fleets, then France's two main rivals on the continent. This initially came to nothing, as the supporters of the {{lang|fr|Jeune École}} doctrine called for a fleet largely based on squadrons of torpedo boats to defend the French coasts rather than an expensive fleet of ironclads. This view had significant support in the Chamber of Deputies.{{sfn|Ropp|p=195}}

The next year, a war scare with Italy led to further outcry to strengthen the fleet. To compound matters, the visit of a German squadron of four ironclads to Italy confirmed French concerns of a combined Italo-German fleet that would dramatically outnumber their own. Training exercises held in France that year demonstrated that the slower French fleet would be unable to prevent the faster Italian squadron from bombarding the French coast at will, in part because it lacked enough cruisers (and doctrine to use them) to scout for the enemy ships. To correct the weaknesses of the French fleet, on 22 November 1890, the Superior Council authorized a new construction program directed not at simple parity with the Italian and German fleets, but numerical superiority. In addition to twenty-four new battleships, a total of seventy cruisers were to be built for use in home waters and overseas in the French colonial empire. The Catinat class were ordered to as part of the program,{{sfn|Ropp|pp=195–197}}{{sfn|Campbell|pp=311–312}} and they were intended to operate in France's overseas colonies.{{sfn|Glennon|p=837}}

File:French cruiser Bugeaud NH66061.jpg

To meet the requirements for new cruisers for overseas deployments, the French naval minister, Édouard Barbey, issued a request on 4 November 1890 for design proposals similar to the older {{sclass|Lapérouse|cruiser|5}} and {{sclass|Villars|cruiser|4}}es. Barbey laid out his requirements for the {{lang|fr|Conseil des Travaux}} (Council of Works), which included a maximum displacement of {{cvt|2500|t|lk=on|0}}, a speed of at least {{convert|16|kn|lk=in}} at natural draft, and a cruising radius of {{convert|4500|nmi|lk=in}} at {{convert|10|kn}} with a normal load of coal (and up to {{cvt|6000|nmi}} with a maximum load). Armament was set at four {{cvt|164.7|mm}} guns and ten {{cvt|100|mm}} guns, and the ship was to be protected by deck consisting of a pair of {{cvt|10|mm}} layers. The new ships were to incorporate a barque sailing rig for extended voyages overseas. The {{lang|fr|Conseil}} made several alterations, including increasing the speed and cruising radius, which necessitated a displacement of around {{cvt|2900|t}}. Barbey approved their recommendations and requested proposals from several shipyards on 3 February 1891.{{sfn|Roberts|p=242}}

Five yards submitted proposals, and on 31 July the {{lang|fr|Conseil}} examined the submissions. The {{lang|fr|Conseil}} selected a design from the shipyard {{lang|fr|Ateliers et Chantiers de la Loire}}, which became the {{sclass|Descartes|cruiser|4}}, but they also chose a submission from the naval engineer Joseph Louis Tissier for further development as well. Tissier had noted that the specifications issued by Barbey were broadly similar to the earlier {{sclass|Friant|cruiser|1}}s, so he based his design on those vessels. He widened the hull slightly and added a layer of wood to the copper sheathing to protect the vessel during lengthy deployments overseas, where shipyard facilities were not readily available.{{sfn|Roberts|pp=245–246}}{{efn|{{lang|fr|AC de la Loire}} had based its design on the cruiser {{ship|French cruiser|Davout||2}}, which had also provided the basis for the Friant design Tissier used for his submission, so the Catinat and Descartes-class cruisers were very similar vessels.{{sfn|Roberts|p=246}}}} The {{lang|fr|Conseil}} requested that Tissier replace the Lagrafel et d'Allest water-tube boilers with Belleville boilers, which would improve the arrangement of the boiler rooms.{{sfn|Roberts|p=246}}

In his revised design, which he had completed by January 1893, Tissier altered the arrangement of the main battery to more closely resemble the {{lang|fr|AC de la Loire}} design; he had originally placed the guns in sponsons that were widely spaced, but the {{lang|fr|Conseil}} preferred the closer arrangement that {{lang|fr|AC de la Loire}} had adopted. On 24 January, Barbey forwarded the design to the {{lang|fr|Conseil}}, which approved it on 7 March. Final approval from the naval command was given on 21 July; the first ship, {{ship|French cruiser|Catinat||2}}, was to be allocated to the 1893 budget, but delays forced her contract to be moved to the 1894 budget.{{sfn|Roberts|pp=246–247}}

File:Le Catinat, protected cruiser, 1896-1911.jpg

The ships of the Catinat class differed slightly in dimensions. Both were {{cvt|101.2|m|0}} long at the waterline, but Catinat was {{cvt|101.56|m|ftin}} long overall while Protet was {{cvt|101.52|m|ftin}} overall. They had a beam of {{cvt|13.6|m|ftin}}, which increased to {{cvt|15.23|and|15.52|m|ftin}} at the sponsons for Catinat and Protet, respectively. Catinat had an average draft of {{cvt|6|m|ftin}}, while Protet{{'}}s draft was {{cvt|6.07|m|ftin}}. Catinat displaced {{cvt|4113.65|t|sp=us}}, while {{ship|French cruiser|Protet||2}} displaced {{cvt|4183.55|t|sp=us}}.{{sfn|Roberts|pp=246–247}} Protet suffered from stability problems and had to have ballast added, accounting for her greater displacement.{{sfn|Glennon|p=837}} Catinat was instead affected by severe vibration at speeds greater than {{convert|15|kn}}; both ships were poorly ventilated.{{sfn|Roberts|p=246}}

Like most French warships of the period, the Catinat-class cruisers' hulls had a pronounced ram bow, tumblehome shape, and a short forecastle deck. Below the waterline, the hulls were covered in a layer of wood and copper sheathing to protect them from biofouling on long voyages overseas. The ships had a minimal superstructure, consisting primarily of a small conning tower and a bridge. They were originally to have been fitted with heavy military masts, but during construction, these were replaced with lighter pole masts with spotting tops for observation and signaling purposes.{{sfn|Campbell|p=312}}{{sfn|Glennon|pp=837–838}} The ships were fitted with four searchlights. Their crew numbered 399 officers and enlisted men.{{sfn|Roberts|pp=246–247}}

The ships' propulsion system consisted of a pair of vertical triple-expansion steam engines driving two screw propellers. Steam was provided by sixteen coal-burning Belleville-type water-tube boilers that were ducted into two funnels. Their machinery was rated to produce {{convert|7000|ihp|lk=on}} normally, and up to {{cvt|9000|ihp}} using forced draft, for a top speed of {{convert|19|kn}}.{{sfn|Glennon|p=837}}{{sfn|Campbell|p=312}} In their initial sea trials, Catinat was reached {{cvt|9933|ihp}} for a speed of {{convert|19.61|kn}} and Catinat made {{cvt|9425|ihp}} for {{convert|20.28|kn}}. Coal storage amounted to {{cvt|570.18|t|sp=us}},{{sfn|Roberts|p=247}} which allowed them to steam for {{convert|6000|nmi}} at a speed of {{convert|10|kn}}.{{sfn|Garbett 1904|p=563}}

File:St Idelsbade (Saint-Idesbalde). Pièce de 100 de marine - Fonds Berthelé - 49Fi1270 (cropped).jpg

The Catinat-class vessels were armed with a main battery of four Canon de 164 mm Modèle 1893 45-caliber guns. They were placed in pairs in a single large sponson amidships, two guns per broadside.{{sfn|Campbell|p=312}} They were supplied with a variety of shells, including solid, {{cvt|45|kg}} cast iron projectiles, and explosive armor-piercing (AP) and semi-armor-piercing (SAP) shells that weighed {{cvt|54.2|kg}} and {{cvt|52.6|kg}}, respectively. The guns fired with a muzzle velocity of {{cvt|770|to|800|m/s}}.{{sfn|Friedman|p=221}}

The main battery was supported by a secondary battery of ten Canon de 100 mm Modèle 1891 (Protet carried the newer M1893 variant), which were carried in a variety of mounts. Two guns fitted with gun shields were placed side-by-side in pivot mounts on the upper deck, four more were in the upper deck forward in casemates. Another pair of guns were in sponsons further aft, and the remaining pair were in pivot mounts on the upper deck aft.{{sfn|Campbell|p=312}}{{sfn|Roberts|p=247}} The guns fired {{cvt|14|kg}} cast iron and {{cvt|16|kg}} AP shells with a muzzle velocity of {{cvt|710|to|740|m/s}}.{{sfn|Friedman|p=225}}

For close-range defense against torpedo boats, they carried ten QF 3-pounder Hotchkiss and four QF 1-pounder pom-pom, all in individual pivot mounts. They were also armed with two {{cvt|356|mm|0}} torpedo tubes in their hulls above the waterline, one per broadside. In addition, they carried a pair of {{cvt|65|mm}} 16-cal. M1881 field guns that could be sent ashore with a landing party.{{sfn|Roberts|p=247}} They had a capacity to carry fifty naval mines, which were stored in the compartment for the steering engine. A rail extended aft, through the captain's cabin, to a port in the stern, where the mines could be dropped into the ships' wake.{{sfn|Campbell|p=312}}

Armor protection consisted of a curved armor deck that was {{cvt|25|mm}} thick on the flat portion, curving down at the sides, where it increased in thickness to {{cvt|40|mm}}, decreasing back down to 25 mm at the lower edge. The deck consisted of mild steel, and was layered on {{cvt|20|mm}} of normal deck plating. Above the deck, a cellular layer of watertight compartments was intended to contain flooding below the waterline. A light splinter deck that was {{cvt|7|mm}} thick covered the propulsion machinery spaces to protect them from shell fragments that penetrated the main armor deck. The gun shields for the deck-mounted 100 mm guns were {{cvt|54|mm|0}} thick. Catinat had {{cvt|80|mm}} steel plating on the conning tower, while Protet received {{cvt|72|mm}}.{{sfn|Roberts|p=247}}{{sfn|Campbell|pp=311–312}}

File:French cruiser Catinat NH 74861.jpg

Catinat was assigned to the Northern Squadron in 1898, where she conducted training exercises with the rest of the unit. During maneuvers that year, she accidentally ran aground, but was not seriously damaged in the incident.{{sfn|Leyland|pp=213–215}} She served in the unit for less than a year before being transferred to the reserve fleet.{{sfn|Naval Notes|p=182}} Protet was sent to the Pacific Ocean for a lengthy deployment after her completion in 1899.{{sfn|Service Performed|p=299}} She helped suppress a fire in the United States in 1900 and protected French interests in Colombia during a conflict in the country in 1901.{{sfn|Hay|p=478}}{{sfn|South America|p=617}} Catinat had been recommissioned and sent abroad by 1901, being stationed in French Madagascar.{{sfn|Jordan & Caresse|p=219}} She operated there at least through 1902.{{sfn|Brassey 1902|p=52}}

At some point thereafter, Catinat was recalled home and decommissioned once more. From 1903 to 1905, she lay at Lorient, where she was "completely abandoned".{{sfn|Roberts|p=247}} In early 1905, she was recommissioned to relieve Protet, which had also been recalled home that year.{{sfn|Garbett 1905|pp=321–322}} After arriving in France, it was determined that Protet{{'}}s boilers were in poor condition, but repairs were deemed to be too expensive.{{sfn|Roberts|p=247}} She was converted into a training ship for gun crews at the Gunnery School in 1908,{{sfn|Garbett 1908|p=864}} but served in that capacity for just two years. She was struck from the naval register in 1910 and thereafter broken up.{{sfn|Smigielski|p=193}} Catinat{{'}}s career in the Pacific was uneventful, and she remained on station in the region through 1908.{{sfn|Garbett 1908|p=863}} She was placed in reserve in July 1909, struck in 1910,{{sfn|Roberts|p=247}} and followed her sister ship to the breakers' yard in 1911.{{sfn|Smigielski|p=193}}

{{notes}}

{{reflist|20em}}

{{Commons category}}

• {{cite journal

|last=Brassey

|first=Thomas A.

|author-link=Thomas Brassey, 2nd Earl Brassey

|title=Chapter III: Relative Strength

|journal=The Naval Annual

|year=1902

|location=Portsmouth

|publisher=J. Griffin & Co.

|pages=47–55

|oclc=496786828

|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=089HAQAAMAAJ

|ref={{sfnRef|Brassey 1902}}

}}

• {{cite book

| last = Campbell

| first = N. J. M.

| chapter = France

| pages = 283–333

| editor1-last = Gardiner

| editor1-first = Robert

| year = 1979

| title = Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905

| publisher = Conway Maritime Press

| location = London

| isbn = 978-0-85177-133-5

| ref = {{sfnRef|Campbell}}

| url-access = registration

| url = https://archive.org/details/conwaysallworlds0000unse_l2e2

}}

• {{cite book

| last = Friedman

| first = Norman

| authorlink=Norman Friedman

| year = 2011

| title = Naval Weapons of World War One: Guns, Torpedoes, Mines and ASW Weapons of All Nations; An Illustrated Directory

| publisher = Naval Institute Press

| location = Annapolis

| isbn = 978-1-84832-100-7

| ref ={{sfnRef|Friedman}}

}}

• {{cite journal

|editor-last=Garbett

|editor-first=H.

|title=Naval Notes: France

|journal=Journal of the Royal United Service Institution

|date=May 1904

|volume=XLVIII

|number=315

|location=London

|publisher=J. J. Keliher & Co.

|pages=560–566

|oclc=1077860366

|ref={{sfnRef|Garbett 1904}}

}}

• {{cite journal

|editor-last=Garbett

|editor-first=H.

|title=Naval Notes: France

|journal=Journal of the Royal United Service Institution

|date=March 1905

|volume=XLIX

|number=325

|location=London

|publisher=J. J. Keliher & Co.

|pages=321–325

|oclc=1077860366

|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lXwzAQAAMAAJ

|ref={{sfnRef|Garbett 1905}}

}}

• {{cite journal

|editor-last=Garbett

|editor-first=H.

|title=Naval Notes: France

|journal=Journal of the Royal United Service Institution

|date=June 1908

|volume=LII

|number=364

|location=London

|publisher=J. J. Keliher & Co.

|pages=861–864

|oclc=1077860366

|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=khddUHrtQyMC

|ref={{sfnRef|Garbett 1908}}

}}

• {{cite journal

|editor-last=Glennon

|editor-first=J. H.

|journal=Proceedings of the United States Naval Institute

|title=The Decennial Programme for Naval Construction in France

|pages=832–838

|year=1894

|volume=XX

|number=4

|location=Annapolis

|publisher=Naval Institute Press

|ref={{sfnRef|Glennon}}

}}

• {{cite journal

|last=Hay

|first=John

|title=Assistance Rendered by French Cruiser Protet in Extinguishing a Fire in San Francisco Harbor

|journal=Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States with the Annual Message of the President

|year=1902

|page=478

|location=Washington D.C.

|publisher=Government Printing Office

|ref={{sfnref|Hay}}

}}

• {{cite book

|last1=Jordan

|first1=John

|last2=Caresse

|first2=Philippe

|title=French Battleships of World War One

|date=2017

|publisher=Naval Institute Press

|location=Annapolis

|isbn=978-1-59114-639-1

|name-list-style=amp

|ref={{sfnRef|Jordan & Caresse}}

}}

• {{cite journal

|last=Leyland

|first=John

|editor-last=Brassey

|editor-first=Thomas A.

|title=Chapter IX: Foreign Naval Manoeuvres

|journal=The Naval Annual

|year=1899

|location=Portsmouth

|publisher=J. Griffin & Co.

|pages=210–218

|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4pNIAQAAMAAJ

|oclc=496786828

|ref={{sfnRef|Leyland}}

}}

• {{cite journal

|title=Naval Notes: France

|journal=Journal of the Royal United Service Institution

|date=1899

|volume=XLII

|number=251

|location=London

|publisher=J. J. Keliher & Co.

|pages=190–193

|oclc=1077860366

|ref={{sfnRef|Naval Notes}}

|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zSMwAQAAMAAJ

}}

• {{cite book

|last=Roberts

|first=Stephen

|title=French Warships in the Age of Steam 1859–1914

|year=2021

|location=Barnsley

|publisher=Seaforth

|isbn=978-1-5267-4533-0

|ref={{sfnref|Roberts}}

}}

• {{cite book

| last = Ropp

| first = Theodore

|authorlink=Theodore Ropp

| title = The Development of a Modern Navy: French Naval Policy, 1871–1904

| editor-last = Roberts

| editor-first = Stephen S.

| year = 1987

| location = Annapolis

| publisher = Naval Institute Press

| isbn = 978-0-87021-141-6

|ref={{sfnRef|Ropp}}

}}

• {{cite journal

| title = Service Performed by French Vessels Fitted with Belleville Boilers

|date=July 1901

| journal = Notes on Naval Progress

| volume = 20

| page = 299

| publisher = United States Office of Naval Intelligence

| location = Washington, D.C.

| oclc = 699264868

| ref = {{sfnRef|Service Performed}}

}}

• {{cite book

|last=Smigielski

|first=Adam

|chapter=France

|pages=190–220

|editor1-last=Gardiner

|editor1-first=Robert

|editor2-last=Gray

|editor2-first=Randal

|title=Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921

|year=1985

|location=Annapolis

|publisher=Naval Institute Press

|isbn=978-0-87021-907-8

|name-list-style=amp

| url=https://archive.org/details/allworldsfightin00rgre

| ref = {{sfnRef|Smigielski}}

}}

• {{cite journal

|title=South America: An Irrepressible Conflict

|journal=The Cyclopedic Review of Current History

|year=1902

|volume=XI

|number=10

|pages=614–617

|location=Boston

|publisher=Current History Company

|ref={{sfnref|South America}}

|oclc=977668285

}}

{{Catinat-class cruiser}}

{{French protected cruisers}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Catinat class cruiser}}

Category:Cruiser classes

Category:Ships built in France

Category:Ship classes of the French Navy