:Cryptoprocta spelea

{{short description|Extinct species of carnivoran from Madagascar}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2022}}

{{speciesbox

| fossil_range = Holocene

| image = Fossa_de_les_cavernes.png

|extinct = pre 1658

| status = EX

| status_system = IUCN3.1

| status_ref = {{cite iucn|last1=Hoffmann|first1= M.|last2= Hawkins|first2= F.|date= 2015|title=Cryptoprocta spelea|page= e.T136456A45221489|doi=10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T136456A45221489.en|access-date=27 March 2021}}

| genus = Cryptoprocta

| species = spelea

| authority = G. Grandidier, 1902

| synonyms_ref =

| synonyms=

  • Cryptoprocta ferox var. spelea G. Grandidier, 1902
  • Cryptoprocta spelea: Petit, 1935
  • Cryptoprocta antamba Lamberton, 1939

| range_map = Cryptoprocta subfossil range map.svg

| range_map_caption = Subfossil sites for Cryptoprocta species: blue—C. spelea; green—C. ferox and C. spelea; red—C. ferox

}}

Cryptoprocta spelea, also known as the giant fossa,Alcover and McMinn, 1994, table 1 is an extinct species of carnivore from Madagascar in the family Eupleridae which is most closely related to the mongooses and includes all Malagasy carnivorans.

It was first described in 1902, and in 1935 was recognized as a separate species from its closest relative, the living fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox). C. spelea was larger than its extant relative, but otherwise similar. The two have not always been accepted as distinct species. When and how C. spelea became extinct is unknown; there is some anecdotal evidence, including reports of very large fossas, that there is more than one surviving species.

The species is known from subfossil bones found in a variety of caves in northern, western, southern, and central Madagascar. In some sites, it occurs with remains of C. ferox, but there is no evidence that the two lived in the same places at the same time. Living species of comparably sized, related carnivores in other regions manage to coexist, suggesting that the same may have happened with both C. spelea and C. ferox. C. spelea would have been able to prey on larger animals than its smaller relative could have, including the recently extinct giant lemurs.

Taxonomy

In 1902, Guillaume Grandidier described subfossil carnivoran remains from two caves on Madagascar as a larger "variety" of the living fossa (Cryptoprocta ferox), C. ferox var. spelea. G. Petit, writing in 1935, considered spelea to represent a distinct species.Goodman et al., 2004, p. 130 Charles Lamberton reviewed subfossil and living Cryptoprocta in 1939 and agreed with Petit in recognizing 2 species,Goodman et al., 2004, pp. 130–131 naming this species from a specimen found at Ankazoabo Cave near the place Itampolo. The generic name translates to "hidden anus" referring to the fact that the anus is hidden by anal sacs in C. ferox.{{Cite journal |last=Pocock |first=R.I. |date=1916 |title=On some of the external characters of Cryptoprocta |url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/18617202 |journal=Annals and Magazine of Natural History |language=en |volume=17 |issue=102 |pages=413–425 |doi=10.1080/00222931608693806 |issn=0374-5481}} The specific name spelea means "cave" and was given because of the location of its discovery.Goodman et al., 2003, p. 1167 However, Lamberton apparently had at most three skeletons of the living fossa, not nearly enough to capture the range of variation in that species, and some later authors did not separate C. spelea and C. ferox as species.Goodman et al., 2004, p. 131

Steven Goodman and colleagues, using larger samples, compiled another set of Cryptoprocta measurements that was published in a 2004 article. They found that some subfossil Cryptoprocta fell outside the range of variation of living C. ferox, and identified those as representing C. spelea.Goodman et al., 2004, p. 136 Grandidier had not designated a type specimen for the species, and to maintain C. spelea as the name for the larger form of the fossa, Goodman and colleagues designated a specimen to serve as the type specimen (specifically, a neotype).Goodman et al., 2004, pp. 136–137

Lamberton recognized a third species, Cryptoprocta antamba, on the basis of a mandible (lower jaw) with abnormally broad spacing between the condyloid processes at the back.Lamberton, 1939, p. 191 He also referred two femora (upper leg bones) and a tibia (lower leg bone) intermediate in size between C. spelea and C. ferox to this species.Lamberton, 1939, p. 193 The specific name refers to the "antamba", an animal allegedly from southern Madagascar described by Étienne de Flacourt in 1658 as a large, rare, leopard-like carnivore that eats men and calves and lives in remote mountainous areas;Goodman et al., 2003, p. 1169; 2004, p. 131 it may have been the giant fossa.Turvey, 2009, p. 34

Goodman and colleagues could not locate Lamberton's material of Cryptoprocta antamba, but suggested that it was based on an abnormal C. spelea.Goodman et al., 2004, p. 137 Together, the fossa and C. spelea form the genus Cryptoprocta within the family Eupleridae, which also includes the other Malagasy carnivorans—the falanouc, the fanalokas, and the Galidiinae. DNA sequence studies suggest that the Eupleridae form a single natural (monophyletic) group and are most closely related to the mongooses of Eurasia and mainland Africa.Garbutt, 2007, p. 208

Description

File:Cryptoprocta Ferox.JPG (Cryptoprocta ferox) is a smaller relative of C. spelea that still survives.]]

Although some morphological differences between the two fossa species have been described,Lamberton, 1939, p. 182 these may be allometric (growth-related), and in their 1986 Mammalian Species account of the fossa, Michael Köhncke and Klaus Leonhardt wrote that the two were morphologically identical.Köhncke and Leonhardt, 1986, p. 2 However, remains of C. spelea are larger than any living C. ferox.

Goodman and colleagues found that spelea were 1.07 to 1.32 times as large as in adult C. ferox, and postcranial measurements were 1.19 to 1.37 times as large. The only specimen of C. spelea in which condylobasal length (a measure of total skull length) could be ascertained measured 153.4 mm (6.04 in), compared to a range of 114.5 to 133.3 mm (4.51 to 5.25 in) in adult C. ferox. Humerus (upper arm bone) length in twelve C. spelea is 122.7 to 146.8 mm (4.83 to 5.78 in), averaging 137.9 mm (5.43 in), compared to 108.5 to 127.5 mm (4.27 to 5.02 in), averaging 116.1 mm (4.57 in), in the extant fossa.Goodman et al., 2004, table 1 Body mass estimates for C. spelea range from 17 kg (37 lb)Personal communication from R. Dewer in Burness et al., 2001, table 1 to 20 kg (44 lb),Wroe et al., 2004, p. 297 and it was among the largest carnivores of the island.Burness et al., 2001, table 1 By comparison, adult C. ferox range from 5 kg (11 lb) to 10 kg (22 lb).Garbutt, 2007, p. 211

{{-}}

Distribution and ecology

class="wikitable" align="right" style="margin-left: 0.5em; margin-top: 0em"

|+ Collection sites

Sitespe.fer.
Ankazoabo+
Antsirabe++
Behova++
Beloha++
Belo sur Mer++
Bemafandry+
Betioky+
Lakaton'ny akanga+
Lelia+
Manombo++
Tsiandroina+
Tsiravé+
colspan="3" | Abbreviations:

  • spe.: C. spelea
  • fer.: C. ferox

Subfossil remains of the giant fossa have been found in Holocene cave sites from the northern end of Madagascar along the west coast to the far south, and in the central highlands. Some sites have yielded both C. spelea and smaller remains referable to the living species, C. ferox; however, lack of robust stratigraphic knowledge and no available radiocarbon dating on subfossil Cryptoprocta bones makes it uncertain whether the two species lived in the same region at the same time.Goodman et al., 2003, pp. 1167–1168; 2004, pp. 140–141 The size ratio between the two species is within the range of ratios seen between similar-sized living cats and mongooses found in the same areas, suggesting that the two species may have been able to occur together.Goodman et al., 2004, p. 141

With its large size and massive jaws and teeth,Goodman et al., 2004, p. 138 C. spelea was a formidable, "puma-like"Goodman, 2003, quoted in Colquhoun, 2006, p. 148 predator, and in addition to smaller prey it may have eaten some of the big, now extinct subfossil lemurs that would have been too large for C. ferox.Goodman et al., 2004, pp. 138–140; Colquhoun, 2006, pp. 148, 156 No subfossil evidence has been found to definitively show that lemurs were its prey; this assumption is based on the diet of the smaller, extant species of fossa.Goodman, 2003, p. 1227 Other possible prey include tenrecs, smaller euplerids, and even young Malagasy hippopotamuses.Alcover and McMinn, 1994, p. 14

Extinction

Why and when C. spelea went extinct is not known; it is possible that C. spelea went extinct before 1400.Goodman et al., 2004, p. 140 C. spelea is on the IUCN Red List.

Local people on Madagascar often recognize two forms of fossa, a larger fosa mainty (or "black Cryptoprocta") and a smaller fosa mena (or "reddish Cryptoprocta").Goodman et al., 2003, p. 1168; 2004, p. 141 There are also some anecdotal records of very large living fossas, such as a 2 m (7 ft), 30 kg (70 lb) fossa at Morondava. Goodman and colleagues suggested that further research may demonstrate that there is more than one species of fossa yet alive.

C. spelea is the only extinct carnivoran mammal known from Madagascar; recently extinct (non-carnivoran) Madagascan animals also include large lemurs, elephant birds, and Malagasy hippopotamuses.Burney et al., 2004, p. 25

The extinction of C. spelea may have changed predation dynamics on Madagascar.Goodman et al., 2004, p. 140

References

{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

Literature cited

  • {{cite journal |last1=Alcover |first1=J.A. |last2=McMinn |first2=M. |title=Predators of Vertebrates on Islands |journal=BioScience |date=1994 |volume=44 |issue=1 |pages=12–18 |doi=10.2307/1312401|jstor=1312401}}
  • {{cite journal |last1=Burness |first1=G.P. |last2=Diamond |first2=J. |last3=Flannery |first3=T. |title=Dinosaurs, dragons, and dwarfs: The evolution of maximal body size |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=2001 |volume=98 |issue=25 |pages=14518–14523 |doi=10.1073/pnas.251548698|jstor=3057309|pmid=11724953 |pmc=64714 |bibcode=2001PNAS...9814518B |doi-access=free }}
  • {{cite journal |last1=Burney |first1=D.A. |last2=Burney |first2=L.P. |last3=Godfrey |first3=L.R. |last4=Jungers |first4=W.L. |last5=Goodman |first5=S.M. |last6=Wright |first6=H.T. |last7=Jull |first7=A.J.T. |title=A chronology for late prehistoric Madagascar |journal=Journal of Human Evolution |date=2004 |volume=47 |issue=1–2 |pages=25–63 |doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.05.005|pmid=15288523 |bibcode=2004JHumE..47...25B }}
  • {{cite journal |last1=Colquhoun |first1=I.C. |title=Predation and Cathemerality |journal=Folia Primatologica |date=2006 |volume=77 |issue=1–2 |pages=143–165 |doi=10.1159/000089701|pmid=16415583 |s2cid=34211531 }}
  • {{cite book|last1=Garbutt|first1= N.|date=2007|title=Mammals of Madagascar: A Complete Guide|publisher=A & C Black|isbn=978-0713670431}}
  • {{cite book|last1= Goodman|first1= S.M.|date= 2003|chapter=Predation on lemurs|pages=1221–1228|editor-last1= Goodman|editor-first1= S.M. |editor-last2= Benstead|editor-first2=J.P.|title=The Natural History of Madagascar|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=0226303063}}
  • {{cite book|last1=Goodman|first1= S.M.|last2= Ganzhorn |first2=J.U. |last3= Rakotondravony|first3= D.|date= 2003|chapter=Introduction to the mammals|pages=1159–1186 |editor-last1= Goodman|editor-first1= S.M. |editor-last2= Benstead|editor-first2=J.P.|title=The Natural History of Madagascar|publisher=University of Chicago Press|isbn=0226303063}}
  • {{cite journal|last1=Goodman|first1= S.M.|last2= Rasoloarison|first2= R.M. |last3=Ganzhorn|first3= J.U. |date=2004|url=http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/1334_z04n1a9.pdf |title=On the specific identification of subfossil Cryptoprocta (Mammalia, Carnivora) from Madagascar|journal=Zoosystema|volume=26|issue=1|pages=129–143|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061127073601/http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/1334_z04n1a9.pdf|archive-date= 27 November 2006}}
  • {{cite iucn|last1=Hoffmann|first1= M.|last2= Hawkins|first2= F.|date= 2015|title=Cryptoprocta spelea|page= e.T136456A45221489|doi=10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T136456A45221489.en|access-date=27 March 2021}}
  • {{cite journal |last1=Köhncke |first1=M. |last2=Leonhardt |first2=K. |title=Cryptoprocta ferox |journal=Mammalian Species |date=1986 |issue=254 |pages=1–5 |doi=10.2307/3503919|jstor=3503919 |doi-access=free }}
  • {{cite journal|last1=Lamberton|first1= C.|date=1939|title=Les Cryptoprocta fossiles|journal=Mémoires de l'Académie malgache|volume=27|pages=155–193}}
  • {{cite book |title=Holocene Extinctions |date=2009 |doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535095.003.0002|publisher=Oxford University Press|last1=Turvey|first1= S.T.|editor-first1=Samuel T |editor-last1=Turvey |isbn=978-0199535095|chapter=In the shadow of the megafauna: prehistoric mammal and bird extinctions across the Holocene |pages=17–40}}
  • {{cite journal |last1=Wroe |first1=S. |last2=Field |first2=J. |last3=Fullagar |first3=R. |last4=Jermin |first4=L.S. |title=Megafaunal extinction in the late Quaternary and the global overkill hypothesis |journal=Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology |date=2004 |volume=28 |issue=1 |pages=291–331 |doi=10.1080/03115510408619286|bibcode=2004Alch...28..291W |s2cid=84785550 |url=http://doc.rero.ch/record/16528/files/PAL_E3242.pdf }}

{{featured article}}