:Defence-class ironclad

In 1859 the Admiralty was not yet convinced that the very expensive (£377,000) {{sclass|Warrior|ironclad}}s, which cost more than twice the wooden, steam-powered ships of the line,Brown, p. 14 had to be accepted as the norm. They noted that the {{convert|4.5|in|adj=on|0}} armour plate of the Warriors was adequate to deflect all ordnance currently afloat, and high speed was not necessary to prevent existing wooden ships from massing their fire against the ironclads. Their Lordships therefore requested a design which, while carrying the same armour, was smaller and slower, and thus cheaper, than the Warriors. Rear Admiral Sir Baldwin Wake Walker, Controller of the Navy, proposed that six ships be built to this design, but he was over-ruled and only two were ordered on 14 December 1859.

The Admiralty's decision saddled the Royal Navy with a pair of ships that could not operate with the Warriors in a tactical squadron and were inferior to the French ironclads then under construction. The naval architect Sir Nathaniel Barnaby, a future Constructor of the Navy, considered that a Defence-class ship was worth one quarter of a Warrior in terms of combat, although they cost about two-thirds as much.Parkes, p. 25

The Defence class was {{convert|280|ft|m|1}} long between perpendiculars and {{convert|291|ft|4|in|m|1}} long overall.Silverstone, p. 157 They had a beam of {{convert|54|ft|2|in|m|1}} and a draught of {{convert|26|ft|2|in|m|1}}.Ballard, p. 241 The ships displaced {{convert|6070|LT|t|lk=on}} and had a tonnage of 3,710 tons burthen. Unlike their predecessors, they were fitted with a ram in the shape of a plough. The ends of the hull were subdivided by watertight transverse bulkheads and had a partial double bottom. Each ship had a complement of 460 officers and ratings. The Defence class was {{convert|128|ft|8|in|1}} shorter overall and displaced more than {{convert|3000|LT|t}} less than the Warrior-class ironclads.Ballard, pp. 164–165, 241

The Defence-class ships had a single two-cylinder trunk steam engine made by John Penn and Sons driving a single {{convert|21|ft|m|1|adj=on}} propeller.Ballard, p. 246 Four rectangular boilers provided steam to the engine at a working pressure of {{convert|20|psi|kPa kg/cm2|0|abbr=on|lk=on}}. The engines produced {{convert|2329|-|2343|ihp|lk=on}} during sea trials which gave the ships maximum speeds of {{convert|11.23|-|11.4|kn|lk=in}}. They carried {{convert|450|LT|t}} of coal,Ballard, pp. 246–247 enough to steam {{convert|1670|nmi|lk=in}} at {{convert|10|knots}}.

The ironclads were barque-rigged and had a sail area of {{convert|24500|sqft|sqm|0}}.Chesneau & Kolesnik, p. 8 The lower masts and bowsprit were made of iron to withstand the shock of ramming. Both ships could make about {{convert|10.5|kn}} under sail alone. To reduce wind resistance while under sail alone, the funnel was semi-retractable. Similarly, the propeller could be hoisted up into the stern of the ship to reduce drag while under sail.Ballard, pp. 164–166

The armament of the Defence-class ships was intended to be 18 smoothbore, muzzle-loading 68-pounder guns, eight on each side on the main deck and one each fore and aft as chase guns on the upper deck, plus four Armstrong 40-pounder guns, an early rifled breech loader (RBL) design, as saluting guns.Parkes, p. 27 The {{convert|8.12|in|mm|adj=on|sigfig=3}} 68-pounder weighed {{convert|10640|lb|kg|0}} and had a range of {{convert|3200|yd}} with solid shot.Lambert, p. 108 During construction the armament was changed to six (Defence) or eight (Resistance) of the new Armstrong rifled 7" breech-loading 110-pounder guns, ten 68-pounders, and either two 32-pounder smoothbores (Resistance) or four breech-loading {{convert|5|in|adj=on|0}} guns (Defence).Parkes, pp. 27–28No such gun ever entered RN service during this time; these may have been experimental 70-pounder Armstrong guns developed in parallel with the 40- and 110-pounder guns or the 40-pounder gun called by its calibre, rounding upwards. The innovative {{convert|9520|lb|0|adj=on}} 110-pounder, whose {{convert|7|in|mm|adj=on|0}} shell could reach {{convert|4000|yd}} was in short supply when the ironclads were launched, and poor results in armour-penetration tests halted plans to fully equip the ironclads with this gun.Lambert, p. 103 Furthermore, the 110-pounders proved problematic in service. They were labour-intensive to load and fire,{{cite book |last=Holley |first=Alexander Lyman |title=A Treatise on Ordnance and Armor |url=https://archive.org/details/treatiseonordnan00hollrich/page/602 |year=1865 |publisher=D Van Nostrand |location=New York |page=602}} and some of them blew up when other ships used them in action.{{cite web|url=http://www.pdavis.nl/Japan.htm|title=W.L. Clowes on the Anglo-Japanese hostilities of 1863–1864|access-date=4 August 2013}}{{cite news |url=http://www.pdavis.nl/Japan.php |title=The Armstrong Guns in Japan |date=25 April 1864 |newspaper=The Times |access-date=4 August 2013 |archive-date=6 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120306064657/http://www.pdavis.nl/Japan.php |url-status=dead }} After that, they were only used with a reduced propellant charge, which left them useless in practice.{{cite book|last=Owen|first=Lieutenant-Colonel C. H.|title=The principles and practice of modern artillery |url=https://archive.org/details/principlespracti00owenrich/page/52 |edition=Second |year=1873 |publisher=John Murray |location=London |page=52}}

Both ships were rearmed in the late 1860s with 14 seven-inch and two eight-inch rifled muzzle-loading guns.Ballard, p. 165 The new guns were heavier so fewer could be carried. On both ships the eight-inch guns were mounted amidships on the main deck on the broadside and a pair of seven-inch guns were mounted on the upper deck as fore and aft chase guns. Eight of the remaining seven-inch guns were also placed on the main deck on the broadside where they were protected by the ship's armour, but one pair was on the main deck further aft where they were not protected by armour. The two ships differed where the last pair of seven-inch guns was positioned: Defence mounted them on the main deck, forward of the armour, while Resistance mounted hers on the upper deck.Parkes, p. 28

The shell of the {{convert|8|in|0|adj=on|spell=in}} weighed {{convert|175|lb|kg|1}} while the gun itself weighed {{convert|9|LT|t}}. It had a muzzle velocity of {{convert|1410|ft/s|m/s|abbr=on}} and was credited with the ability to penetrate {{convert|9.6|in|mm|0}} of wrought iron armour at the muzzle. The {{convert|6.5|LT|t|adj=on}} seven-inch gun fired a {{convert|112|lb|kg|1}} shell and could penetrate {{convert|7.7|in|mm|adj=on|0}} armour.Roberts, p. 6 All of the guns could fire both solid shot and explosive shells.Lambert, pp. 108–109

File:HMS Defence (1861).jpg 1888; the shaded area shows the ship's armour]]

The Defence-class ships had a wrought iron armour belt, {{convert|4.5|in|mm|0}} thick, that covered {{convert|140|ft|1}} amidships. The armour extended from upper deck level to {{convert|6|ft|m|1|spell=in}} below the waterline. Transverse bulkheads 4.5 inches thick protected the guns on the main deck from raking fire. The armour was backed by {{convert|18|in}} of teak. The ends of the ship were left entirely unprotected which meant that the steering gear was very vulnerable. They were, however, sub-divided into many watertight compartments to minimize any flooding.Ballard, pp. 165, 244

HMS Defence was assigned to the Channel Squadron upon completion in 1862. The ship was paid off in 1866 to refit and be re-armed and was briefly reassigned to the Channel Squadron again when she recommissioned in 1868. Defence had brief tours on the North American and Mediterranean Stations, from 1869 to 1872, then refitted again from 1872 to 1874. She became guard ship on the Shannon when she recommissioned. The ship was assigned to the Channel Squadron a third time in 1876, and in 1879 became guard ship on the Mersey until 1885. Defence was then placed in reserve. In 1890, she was assigned to the mechanical training school at Devonport. She was renamed Indus when the school adopted that name and served there until sold in 1935.Ballard, pp. 168–169

HMS Resistance was the first capital ship in the Royal Navy to be fitted with a ram and was given the nickname of Old Rammo. She was initially assigned to the Channel Squadron, but was transferred to the Mediterranean Station in 1864, the first ironclad to be assigned to that squadron. Resistance was rearmed in 1867 and became a guardship when recommissioned in 1869. The ship was reassigned to the Channel Squadron in 1873 before reverting to her former duties in 1877. Resistance was decommissioned in 1880 and was used for gunnery and torpedo trials beginning in 1885. The ship was sold for scrap in 1898 and foundered the following year en route to the breaker's yard. Her wreck was later salvaged and scrapped.Ballard, pp. 167–168

{{reflist|group=Note}}

{{reflist|30em}}

{{Commons category|Defence class battleship}}

• {{cite book|last=Ballard|first=G. A., Admiral|title=The Black Battlefleet |year=1980|publisher=Naval Institute Press|location=Annapolis, Maryland |isbn=0-87021-924-3|author-link=George Alexander Ballard}}
• {{cite book|last=Brown|first=David K.|title=Warrior to Dreadnought: Warship Development 1860–1905|year=1997|publisher=Chatham Publishing|location=London|isbn=1-86176-022-1}}
• {{citation|last1=Dodson|first1=Aidan|title=The Incredible Hulks: The Fisgard Training Establishment and Its Ships|work=Warship 2015|pages=29–43|year=2015| isbn=978-1-84486-276-4 |publisher=Conway |location=London}}
• {{cite book|title=Warship 1996|editor-last1=McLean|editor-first1= David|editor-last2 =Preston|editor-first2=Antony|publisher=Conway Maritime Press|location=London|year=1996 |isbn=0-85177-685-X|name-list-style=amp|editor-link2=Antony Preston|last=Jones|first=Colin |chapter=Entente Cordiale, 1865}}
• {{cite book|last=Lambert|first=Andrew|title=HMS Warrior 1860: Victoria's Ironclad Deterrent|edition=2nd revised and expanded|year=2010|publisher=Naval Institute Press |location=Annapolis, Maryland|isbn=978-1-59114-382-6}}
• {{Cite book|last=Parkes|first=Oscar|title=British Battleships|publisher=Naval Institute Press |location=Annapolis, Maryland|year=1990|orig-year=1957|isbn=1-55750-075-4}}
• {{cite book|last=Silverstone|first=Paul H.|title=Directory of the World's Capital Ships|year=1984 |publisher=Hippocrene Books|location=New York|isbn=0-88254-979-0}}
• {{winfield}}

{{Defence class ironclad}}

{{British ironclads}}

Category:Battleship classes

Category:Ship classes of the Royal Navy

Category:Victorian-era battleships of the United Kingdom