:Draft:Blockade of Zanzibar

Two years earlier, in 29 October – 1 November 1886,{{cite book |last=Dispossession |first=Beyong |date=September 18, 2018 |title=Spatial Appropriations in Modern Empires, 1820-1960 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UqqwDwAAQBAJ |publisher=Cambridge Scholars Publishing |isbn=9781527540156 |page=89}} an agreement was made between the British and German governments to prevent the Germans from taking over the whole of East Africa.{{cite web |last=Itandala |first=Buluda |date=2012 |title=The Anglo-German Partition of East Africa |url=https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA08566518_27 |publisher=Sabinet African Journals |page=12}} The two agreed to limit the Sultan of Zanzibar's mainland territory to a ten-mile wide coastal strip. In the interior, the German sphere would extend from the Umba River to Lake Victoria Nyanza in the north and to the Rovuma River in the south, while the British sphere would extend from the German boundary up to the Juba River in the north.

Later, the coastal territories of the Sultanate were administered and operated by the Imperial British East Africa Company (IBEAC), since 1887, and by the German East Africa Company (DOAG), since April 28, 1888.{{cite web |last=Liebst |first=Michelle |title=The Anglo-German Partition of East Africa |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/5E0A2E2F535C15592ED9485E6BCC767D/S0738248023000561a.pdf/sultans_of_zanzibar_and_the_abolition_of_slavery_in_east_africa.pdf |publisher=Cambridge University Press |page=62}} The agreement divided the Sultanate into the British to the north (Kenya), and the Germans to

the south (Tanzania).

Following the expansion of the German East Africa Company over three years, a revolt, known as Abushiri revolt, began in August 1888, which sparked the initiative for a blockade by the Germans.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=267}}

Realizing they could not solve the problem alone, the German Empire developed a diplomatic action, inviting the British Empire. Germany argued for British involvement to defend their company's interests and securing their northern territories.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=267}} Prince Bismarck also invited to join in the blockade the Cabinets of Paris, Lisbon, Brussels, and Rome.{{cite book |date=1889 |title=Parliamentary Debates |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HI5Uama4rS8C |volume=334 |page=889}}

On November 5, just two days after receiving the German memorandum, the

British agreed to support a naval blockade, though it refused to intervene on land, which would prevent not only the slave trade, but

also the supply of arms and ammunition from the Arab nations via the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=267}}

On November 8, 1888, the Baron de Waecker-Gotter, German

ambassador to Lisbon, in the name of the Prince of Bismarck,

delivered a dispatch to Henrique de Barros Gomes, Minister of Foreign Affairs, with an invitation to take part in the blockade.{{cite book |date=1890 |title=Das Staatsarchiv |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ScAZdRSGMSQC |volume=50 |page=67}}

On the 16th, George Glynn Petre, ambassador of the United Kingdom to Portugal, also supported the idea to the Portuguese Minister. That same day, Barros Gomes replied to the German ambassador that Portugal would not decline the invitation.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=269}}

Two days later, on the 18th, he also replied to Petre, that for this objective, the blockade on the east coast of Africa should be extended to include a part of the coast of Mozambique.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=269}}

Unlike Portugal, the Italians did not join the blockade to patrol their own coastline in Somalia, but rather to patrol in the German and British areas, which required less naval units.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=277}}

The Kingdom of Italy, however, had its own reasons for joining the blockade. On one hand, to secure its interests along the Somali coast, and on the other, to continue its fight against the slave trade.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=277}}

It is known that in April 1889, 1,282 dhows were boarded and inspected by the Royal navy, and about 1,500 by the German navy.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=283}} According to Chériau:

{{quote|…despite such a demonstration of force, and much to the embarrassment of Admiral Fremantle, the results of the blockade seemed meager.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=283}}}}

Only one ship was seized with weapons, and another, under a French flag, with three slaves on board.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=283}}

In December 1888, the German corvette Carola captured a dhow carrying 84 slaves and 17 Arabs. The Arabs resisted, killing three German sailors, but were defeated.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=284}}

Comprising of 7 ships, the fleet was under command of Rear Admiral Karl August Deinhard. Meanwhile, the Leipzig was, during the blockade, under Captain Franz Strauch (August 1888 – February 1889), Lieutenant Commander Hermann da Fonseca-Wollheim (February 1889 – March 1889), and Captain Max Plüddemann (March 1889 — November 1890).{{sfn|Saldanha|p=272–273}}

Comprising of 8 ships, the fleet was under command of Rear Admiral Edmund Fremantle. The flagship Boadicea, however, was under Captain Assheton Curzon-Howe.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=274–275}}

Comprising of 8 ships, it was the largest squadron, along with the British, led by Governor-General of Mozambique Augusto Castilho. Although a Navy officer, Castilho did not board any of the ships, so the command would be assumed by the Chief of the Naval

Division, Captain José Alemão de Mendonça.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=278}}

It was the smallest naval force of the blockade, comprised by only two ships, with the cruiser R.M. Dogali under command of Frigate Captain Francesco Preve.{{sfn|Saldanha|p=276}}

{{notelist}}

{{reflist}}

• {{cite web |last=Saldanha |first=Nuno |date=1889 |title=The Blockade of Zanzibar (1888-1889) |url=https://www.academia.edu/128584856 |website=academia.edu}}
• {{cite book |last=Cheriau |first=Raphaël |date=May 3, 2021 |title=Imperial Powers and Humanitarian Interventions |publisher=Routledge |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GoMmEAAAQBAJ |isbn=9781000383010}}