:Talk:Canthaxanthin

This article was categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 01:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Incorrect. Canthaxanthin is no longer used for farm-raised salmon. It was shown to have issues being used as a human nutritional supplement. Hence, Astaxanthin is now, and has been for years, the primary colorant in salmon and other aquaculture.

--meatclerk 21:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I have made my statement about the accuracy of this article.

Another editor points to this information, as to the accuracy of this article.

http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/webpage/canthaxanthin_qanda/

meatclerk 06:02, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

: So why is this disputed? At all? Because that website is an official government website for the UK and it clearly stipulates that Canthaxanthin is used in poultry and salmon. --I'll bring the food 06:17, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

The relieve the situtation and add accuracy to this article I am rewriting it in a sandbox. You may judge the outcome, at your leisure.

/rewrite_2006-08-20

meatclerk 05:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The rewrite is ready. I intend on updating the article in a few days, likely 2006/10/12 PDT.

Here is the link for the rewrite /rewrite_2006-08-20 -- meatclerk 17:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Even if you fed salmon the previously used maximum dose of canthaxanthin (80 parts per million), a person would have to eat more than 1000 kg of bright red salmon in order to approach the published No Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL)for humans. And there is plenty of peer-reviewed data to suggest that canthaxanthin is an antioxidant with cancer supressive effects. So for me, canthaxanthin was, and remains very safe unless consumed in mega-mega-doses. Common table salt, or caffeine, or even water are more dangerous as the difference between the recommended amounts and their 'toxic' levels are very much smaller. I guess that one can put this into a different context: Canadian farmed salmon was pigmented exclusively with canthaxanthin for around 20 years (I guess) without a single case of problems in humans resulting from salmon consumption. That is one massive field study, wouldn't you say?

See the scientific paper by Baker (2002), in the Journal 'Trends in Food Sciences & Technology'

87.139.52.154 14:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)Gonzman

This article talk page was automatically added with {{tl|WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Biosynthesis - should be bacterium Escherichia coli.

Canthanaxanthin (twice) - delete extra na.

Effects on human pigmentation and health - is panniculus supposed to be panniculus adiposus? If so it would be better to just say subcutaneous fat.

Sources, Added, and Food (ANS) should be capitalized but canthaxanthin should not be.

69.72.92.124 (talk) 08:55, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Canthaxanthin. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=749442720 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130628030401/http://www.laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-83-593/FullText.html to http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor-83-593/FullText.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)