:Talk:Computer science
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Afd-merged-from|Informatics Practices|Informatics Practices|9 September 2018|7 October 2018}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Computer science|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction|importance=Top}}
}}
{{To do}}
{{Copied|from=Computer science|from_oldid=958423907|to=Computer science education|to_diff=958632427|to_oldid=951189804}}
{{Annual readership|days=1000}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 50K
|counter = 6
|minthreadsleft = 2
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Computer science/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{clear}}
Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2024 (2)
{{edit semi-protected|Computer science|answered=yes}}
Hamoodyshal1 (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Berger E (2017) Csrankings: Computer science rankings. http://csrankings.org, accessed: 2017-05-01
:File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —Bagumba (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Should the CS article be bumped up to Level 2 in vitality?
The computer science article is one of the most important, if not the most important article relating to computer science - since it literally is about computer science. I think it should be bumped up to atleast Level 2 for now since there is still some things we have to include into the article such as references. Vivaidris (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)