:Talk:Cozen O'Connor

This article is not a candidate for speedy deletion, as it asserts notability and uses reliable third party sources. Take a look at the other articles in :Category:Law firms of the United States, this one follows almost the exact same format. People need to actually read the policy before they start tagging things indiscriminately. --Eastlaw (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

This was not an indiscriminate addition of the speedy tag. The article is written like an ad and I see nothing that asserts notability. Feel free to dispute it, and I'll accept the eventual ruling. But there are far too many of these types of articles on WP. The existance of others is not a reason to allow this one.--Dmol (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Cozen O'Connor. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=730726917 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081029045442/http://www.mindingthelawsbusiness.com/minding_the_laws_business/files/AmLawTop200PerformanceStatistics.pdf to http://www.mindingthelawsbusiness.com/minding_the_laws_business/files/AmLawTop200PerformanceStatistics.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)