:Talk:David Petraeus

Currently, our article states:

:One additional aspect of Petraeus's career that has come under increased scrutiny since his affair came to light has been his lack of a direct combat record in relation to the many awards he received. In particular, his Bronze Star Medal with Valor device has been mentioned in several media reports and questioned by several former Army officers. The citation for Petraeus's Bronze Star with "V" device also notes his "leadership under fire", as does award of the Combat Action Badge, but neither provides a detailed account of his actions.

The sole cited source is a Business Insider article, which links only to a Buzzfeed piece, and which cites only the views of Colonel (Ret.) Douglas Macgregor. The article says that BI "has filed a Freedom Of Information Request for Patraeus' bronze star award citation"—but nothing about the outcome of that FOIA.

From what I can glean, both Wikivoice assertions about "several media reports" and "several former Army officers" are uncited and unsourced—and I'm unable to find corroboration for those phrases. Indeed, the only other piece I can find about the topic is a blog post on the obviously unreliable DailyKos. Worse are the claims about the "citation" for the award: as per above, the sole cited source didn't even have access to it.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David_Petraeus/Archive_1#Bronze_Star Prior] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:David_Petraeus/Archive_2#Lack_of_objectivity discussions] regarding the topic on this Talk page have not cited additional, let alone better sources.

Most broadly, I would question whether a contentious claim in a single articles from a fairly low-tier source deserves mention in the article. Petraeus is one of the best-known, broadly covered, and roundly criticized military figures in recent history, and if there was legitimate concern about "stolen valor", I can only assume better sources would have been all over it. More urgently, given the patent lack of WP:RS for the above Wikivoice statements, I have removed the passage for now, simply to correct what seems like a self-evident failure to follow the strict requirements of WP:BLP. That said, I'm open-minded about whether the questions are WP:DUE, and am happy to see information about the Bronze Star medal if more/better sources can be cited and/or if our language can be reworked to conform to our high standards. Thanks, and please ping in response! Ekpyros (talk) 14:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

The article contains 12 citations to Foxnews.com, and this is a topic that involves politics, including US politics. Six of the citations are to articles published after November 2020. Per WP:FOXNEWSPOLITICS, "{{xt|There is consensus Fox News is generally unreliable for the reporting of politics, especially from November 2020 onwards. On the matter of science, and on the matter of pre-November 2020 politics, there is a consensus that the reliability of Fox News is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use. ...}}" —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:59, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

After many years using MDY date format, the article was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Petraeus&diff=prev&oldid=1263564599 edited a few months ago] without any Talk page discussion that I could find, so that it now says DMY dates should be used. Currently, I see that the article currently has a mixture{{snd}} it contains a lot of MDY dates. Both formats are justifiable for this topic, but date formats are not supposed to be changed casually. Should that change be reverted? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:59, 28 April 2025 (UTC)