:Talk:Erbium

I don't have the knowledge to include the following references in this article but they could be useful:

• [https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.012509 Anisotropic polarizability of erbium atoms]
• [http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.210401 Bose-Einstein Condensation of Erbium]
• [https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2014.2376975 Few-Mode Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers: A Review]
• [https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202100030 On‐Chip Integrated Waveguide Amplifiers on Erbium‐Doped Thin‐Film Lithium Niobate on Insulator]
• {{ISBN|9789201032218}} Alternative Radionuclide Production with a Cyclotron

Plus some that look a little more readable:

• [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03046-7 Efficacy, safety, and guidelines of application of the fractional ablative laser erbium YAG 2940 nm and non-ablative laser erbium glass in rejuvenation, skin spots, and acne in different skin phototypes: a systematic review]
• [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2022.100268 The role of Cerium, Europium and Erbium doped TiO2 photocatalysts in water treatment: A mini-review]
• [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.005 Rare earth elements: A review of applications, occurrence, exploration, analysis, recycling, and environmental impact]
• [https://doi.org/10.1289%2Fehp.96104s185 Exposure, metabolism, and toxicity of rare earths and related compounds]

Reconrabbit 20:13, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:Great! The Hirano/Suzuki paper lead me to look at Rare-earth element. WoW! what a mess. The On human health section was completely, 100% wrong. Decent references but every one was misrepresented. You might consider taking a look at that article. Johnjbarton (talk) 23:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

When was the info box image changed and why 2603:8080:D03:89D4:78F9:3A7C:D9A2:F709 (talk) 17:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)