:Talk:Farnesol
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Food and drink|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Chemicals|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Molecular Biology|MCB=yes|MCB-importance=low}}
}}
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Farnesol name
Is Farnesol the name for the compound shown only? if so then the stereo should be defined in the name as E,E,E —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChemSpiderMan (talk • contribs) 20:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
[[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with {{tl|WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Claim of "disputed" evidence of allergic reactions
The notion from the Health effects section that "the evidence that farnesol can cause an allergic reaction in humans is disputed" is a bit of a stretch given the reference cited. Firstly, the reference is a quite opinionated survey essay, or spin, from a lobby organization for the fragrance industry itself. Secondly, and more importantly, credibility notwithstanding, the cited reference does not actually identify farnesol as one of the substances in question. Instead, Farnesol is listed in the category "rarely found as allergens". The "disputed" claim is unsubstantiated, and should be removed or at the very least heavily modified. In general, in my opinion, citing trade organization spin as evidence without identifying it as such is not a useful practice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Einarius70 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on Farnesol. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=757310299 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111230042603/http://www.ifraorg.org/en-us/standards_restricted/s3/p4 to http://www.ifraorg.org/en-us/standards_restricted/s3/p4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)