Login
Login

:Talk:Frozan Fana

{{Old XfD multi| date = 22 August 2009 (UTC) | result = keep | page = Frozan Fana }}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|blp=yes|listas=Fana, Frozan|1=

{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=low}}

{{WikiProject Afghanistan|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}}

}}

Untitled

I would have thought that any presidential candidate could be notable, particularly a woman candidate in a country like Afghanistan. PatGallacher (talk) 01:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

:She's definitely not a candidate for speedy deletion, that's for sure. The article could use expansion, though. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 01:42, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

::That, alone, is not a claim of notability. There were over 1000 claimed presidential candidates in the United States in 2008, and probably over 400 who were actually on the ballot in some state. They're not all notable. Perhaps not speedy, but there is certainly not much of a claim of notability. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

:::Afghanistan's only had one election previously, and having a woman lead the country would probably cause heart attacks in 1/3 of the populace. So it's not quite the same as American elections. {{mono|1=:P}} I agree, though, it needs more sourcing; BLP1E and all. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Comment

{{cite news

| url=http://www.sabawoon.com/index.php?page=afghanelection

| title=Preliminary Result of Afghanistan Presidential Contest

| date=2009-08-20

| author=

| publisher=Sabawoon online

| archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sabawoon.com%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Dafghanelection&date=2009-08-30

| archivedate=2009-08-30

}}

WRT to Fana's share of the popular vote...

Someone added that Fana got less than .5 % of the popular vote.

name || votes || percent
votes || cumulative
Zia-ul-haq Hafizi   724  0.035607  0.035607
Abdul Majid Samim   998  0.049082  0.084689
Hidayat Amin Arsala   1067  0.052476  0.137165
Sangin Mohammad Rahmani   1138  0.055968  0.193133
Bashir Ahmad Bizhan   1272  0.062558  0.255691
Mohammad Akbar Oria   1353  0.066542  0.322232
Gul Ahmmad Yama   1434  0.070525  0.392758
Zabih-U-llah Ghazi Noristani   1516  0.074558  0.467316
Engineer Moin-ul-din Ulfati   1645  0.080902  0.548218
Abdul Hasib Arian   2027  0.099689  0.647907
Bismillah Shir   2179  0.107165  0.755072
Dr Ghulam Faroq Nijrabi   2240  0.110165  0.865237
Mulla Ghulam Mohammad Rigi   2240  0.110165  0.975402
Mohammad Hashim Tawfiqi   2406  0.118329  1.093731
Abdul Jabar Sabit   2560  0.125903  1.219634
Haji Rahim Jan Shinzad   3118  0.153346  1.372980
Mohammad Sarwar Ahmadzai   4028  0.198100  1.571080
Shahla Ata   4356  0.214231  1.785311
Alhaj Abdul Ghafor Zori   4955  0.243691  2.029002
Sayed Jalal Karim   5572  0.274035  2.303037
Mahbob-U-lah Koshani   5755  0.283035  2.586072
Abdul Latif Pedram   7311  0.359561  2.945633
Dr Habib Mangal   7339  0.360938  3.306571
Motasim Billah Mazhabi   7841  0.385626  3.692197
Dr Frozan Fana   8159  0.401266  4.093463
Mulla Abdul Salam Rakity   8250  0.405741  4.499205
Shahnawaz Tanai   13512  0.664531  5.163735
Mirwais Yasini   23059  1.134059  6.297794
Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai   48375  2.379120  8.676914
Ramazan Bashardost   277404  13.642943  22.319857
Dr Abdullah Abdullah   638924  31.422775  53.742632
Hamed Karzai   940558  46.257368  100.000000

So, the top 3 candidates got 91.3 % of the vote, and the bottom 29 shared 8.68 % between them.

The top 7 candidates got 96 perecent of the vote. Fana shared 4 percent of the vote with 24 other candidates.

The initial Sabawoon voting results should be replaced with later, more definitive results. Geo Swan (talk) 04:00, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

:So? That wouldn't be relevant in an election where elections are common. You'd need to make a special case for this election for anything other than the statement that she was 8th with less than 0.5%. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

::I did the math because your addition surprised me. I found 0.5% a surprising number.

::How relevant is it? I don't know. I thought other contributors who also wondered might benefit from the work I did generating those statistics.

::I don't know what you mean about "making a case". I don't think I have to "make a case" to include rough work, relevant to the content of the article, on its talk page. Do you think I do? Geo Swan (talk) 15:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

:::I don't see any reason to accumulate the votes. Less than 0.5% is correct, although the rank and a more precise count (if the count were reliable) would be reasonable. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:23, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Frozan Fana election symbol.jpg Nominated for Deletion

100px

| An image used in this article, File:Frozan Fana election symbol.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012

;What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Frozan Fana election symbol.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Frozan Fana. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=804349394 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=94888§ionid=351020403
  • Corrected formatting/usage for http://zeldalily.com/index.php/category/frozan-fana/
  • Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.internews.org/prs/2009/20090513_afghan.shtm
  • Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/681650
  • Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111349105
  • Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i-UmwryIsQh6f1HpnLsKuCBbG7xgD99SS3U80
  • Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gJqqwsD5Y0A7kZPyMt0eXKx3RpVw
  • Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sabawoon.com/index.php?page=afghanelection
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20011129022125/http://www.frozan.org/ to http://www.frozan.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)