:Talk:Greenlee Partners

This isn't eligible for speedy deletion because it does assert notability and that notability is supported by refs.--Blargh29 (talk) 03:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

:Two of the refs are not independant of the source. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:52, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

::Then go for AFD, cause notability is asserted.-Blargh29 (talk) 04:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenlee_Partners&action=historysubmit&diff=322037835&oldid=322014691 removed] the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenlee_Partners&action=historysubmit&diff=322014691&oldid=321970592 prods] because I have expanded coverage of the firm's history, two of the firm's major lobbying successes, and included references of articles from major Pennsylvania newspapers that attest to the firm's influence within Pennsylvania government.--Blargh29 (talk) 00:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

:The prods also mentioned serious POV issues, which have not been addressed. Hairhorn (talk) 02:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

:I've made a quick attempt at taking out some of the more outlandishly biased claims (eg: calling them the "gold standard"). Hairhorn (talk) 16:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

::I have [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenlee_Partners&action=historysubmit&diff=322243143&oldid=322153630 added] a quote from the Pennsylvania Report with its description of the firm. I have also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greenlee_Partners&diff=next&oldid=322243143 added] a cite to show that the "Harrisburg Online" has been cited in the mainstream media. These are both appropriate under WP:V and WP:NPOV.--Blargh29 (talk) 00:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Greenlee Partners. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=772057428 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711124841/http://www.greenleepartners.com/professionals.htm to http://www.greenleepartners.com/professionals.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pa-report.com/uploaded_pdf/PA%20Report%20100%20-%20Jan%2023%2C%202009.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.legis.state.pa.us/wu01/li/mi/lobby/NAMES/EWANCO_ROBERT_J.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greenlee Partners. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=806694544 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091109040638/http://www.insiderpa.com/archive/insider8-2002.htm to http://www.insiderpa.com/archive/insider8-2002.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091130211540/http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_655376.html to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_655376.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

A newly created account has been removing sourced content from the lobbying history section. I have no personal attachment to the subject, except I do not think removing sourced content is beneficial. I leave this as a placeholder for more involved editors to comment. Ifnord (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2021 (UTC)