:Talk:Haviva Reik
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Reik, Haviva|blp=no|1=
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject Slovakia|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Palestine|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Jewish history|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Jewish Women|importance=low}}
}}
Zionism-Israel.com being judged NOT WP:RS
FYI at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#zionism-israel.com_on_Zionist_history as of 1/1/09. CarolMooreDC (talk) 18:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
:FYI after that discussion started someone must have rebooted the search engine because suddenly dozens of uses popped up and there were no more denials it was a reliable source, at least on a case by case basis. CarolMooreDC (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Questions
I think it's a fascinating article. How did they manage to get away with running a soup kitchen for as long as they did? delldot ∇. 17:39, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
:And it says they rescued pilots that were shot down--that can't have happened often, could it? To be shot down, AND survive, AND get found by the group? I can't imagine they did it more than one or two times, right? delldot ∇. 23:44, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Requested move
:The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC) {{RMnac}}
:Haviva Reick → {{no redirect|Haviva Reik}} – A Google Books search returns [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&rls=en&tbm=bks&spell=1&q=%22Haviva+Reik%22&sa=X&ei=ncbkUJXTDqKS0QHYzoGICw&ved=0CC8QBSgA&biw=947&bih=522#hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&rls=en&tbm=bks&spell=1&q=%22Haviva+Reik%22&sa=X&ei=eCLlUKfoHcXv0QHeyoGYDg&ved=0CC8QBSgA&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.dmQ&fp=ad9807c32490cd9c&bpcl=40096503&biw=946&bih=491 About 576 results] for Haviva Reik and [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&rls=en&tbm=bks&spell=1&q=%22Haviva+Reik%22&sa=X&ei=ncbkUJXTDqKS0QHYzoGICw&ved=0CC8QBSgA&biw=947&bih=522#hl=en&client=safari&tbo=d&rls=en&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22Haviva+Reick%22&oq=%22Haviva+Reick%22&gs_l=serp.3...284547.284547.1.284956.1.0.1.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1c.1.mBZwcfDDo34&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1355534169,d.dmQ&fp=ad9807c32490cd9c&bpcl=40096503&biw=946&bih=491 only 31] for Haviva Reick, most of the latter are Wikipedia collections. --Relisted Tyrol5 [Talk] 04:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC) delldot ∇. 06:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support - clearly correct. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support Seems to be the more common spelling. Also note that the Commons category is spelled that way. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.