:Talk:Julia Phillips

{{Talk header}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|vital=yes|listas=Phillips, Julia|blp=no|1=

{{WikiProject Women's History| importance = Low}}

{{WikiProject Biography|filmbio-priority=high|filmbio-work-group=yes|a&e-work-group=yes|a&e-priority=}}

{{WikiProject New York City|importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Judaism|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Jewish culture|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Jewish Women|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Women in Business|importance=low}}

}}

Best Producer?

Is it accurate to say that someone is nominated for producing a film? The film itself, not the producer(s), is nominated for Best Picture. ForDorothy 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

:It's a fine point. It's producer-people who get the kudos of the statuette on their mantels, and nobody in Hollywood history knew how to exploit that better than Julia.

:On your edit to the main article -- another fine point. Her actual credit on those productions was Producer, not Co-producer. In the logic of Hollywood, being one of three producers does not necessarily make you a co-producer. But I'm not inclined to revert.

:El Ingles 16:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Edit by Bovineboy2008

Yesterday this user removed "Academy award-winning" from the lead of this article, justifying his edit as removing a "peacock term." In discussion on his user page he further stated that the term gives her "unnecessary status." I protest this edit and I seek consensus to restore the term. --El Ingles (talk) 19:25, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

:Please read WP:ACTOR#On-going projects/to do lists BOVINEBOY2008 :) 19:37, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

:: Done. I suppose Meryl Streep and Paul Newman are exceptions, then? Or are you going to get mean with them too? --El Ingles (talk) 22:44, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

:::I don't see "award-winning" in their lede sentences...BOVINEBOY2008 :) 23:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)