:Talk:Kate Upton

See Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BLP issue at Kate Upton: leaked photos Jytdog (talk) 01:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

• I object to the naming of this issue above and on the notice board. It is sexist and dismissive and rude. As a woman I am totally offended by the heading as well as the fact that content, which I found offensive and which was obviously harmful to the subject of this BLP article (which is why I removed it), was restored. -- BrillLyle (talk) 10:23, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

::Tweaked section heading and link in OP a bit per change made by {{u|Kingsindian}} at :WP:BLPN#BLP issue at Kate Upton: leaked photos and :WP:TPG#Section headings. {{ping|Jytdog|BrillLyle}} I hope the new heading is acceptable to both of you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

:::It's fine. Jytdog (talk) 06:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

::: It's not about what is "acceptable to both." It is about what is not offensive. It is about reinforcing sexism and re-abusing someone who has been victimized. I think this is very clear, but what do I know. Apparently I know nothing and only male editors on Wikipedia can take action or have a voice. But yeah, thanks for changing. I know this was hard. -- BrillLyle (talk) 23:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

::::{{reply to|BrillLyle}} Not hard at all and in fact even allowed per :WP:TPG#Section headings, regardless of one's gender. "Acceptable to both" was just meant as a courtesy to see if there was a consensus for this change since the two of you had previously posted in the thread; it had nothing to doing with {{tq|only male editors on Wikipedia can take action or have a voice}}; in fact, I don't think I've stated I'm male anywhere in any of the ongoing discussions about this or claimed that being male gives anyone any special privaledges when it comes to editing. Moreover, just in case you missed it, I did suggest changing the BLPN section heading and the talk page heading at the very beginning of this post. FWIW, your gender has never even crossed my mind with respect to any of the posts I made and I believe I've kept my comments focused on relevant policies and guidelines, and not other editors. Now, if you'd prefer that the section heading be further changed, be bold and change it yourself or suggest something different. If you do change it, keep in mind the fifth paragraph of :MOS:HEAD (which discussed such changes), and add an :WP:ANCHOR if needed to preserve any links. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kate Upton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110623165225/http://www.equinechronicle.com/lifestyle/apha-youth-exhibitor-finds-success-as-international-fashion-model.html to http://www.equinechronicle.com/lifestyle/apha-youth-exhibitor-finds-success-as-international-fashion-model.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110925025557/http://www.fhm.com/girls/news/kate-upton-is-milking-cows-for-complex-82079 to http://www.fhm.com/girls/news/kate-upton-is-milking-cows-for-complex-82079

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

http://www.kateupton.com/ seems to be expired. Remove? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gprobins (talk • contribs) 15:49, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

:Yup. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)