:Talk:Michael Erlewine

{{Talk header}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|listas=Erlewine, Michael|blp=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes|musician-work-group=yes|musician-priority=}}

{{WikiProject Astrology|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Pennsylvania|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject California |importance=low}}

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}

|maxarchivesize = 70K

|counter = 1

|minthreadsleft = 3

|algo = old(30d)

|archive = Talk:Michael Erlewine/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{Notable Wikipedian|Merlewine|Erlewine, Michael}}

{{find}}

Proposed merge with [[All Media Network]]

{{archive top|result=The result of this discussion is not merge. North America1000 17:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)}}

Seems like whole group of articles strategically created on Wikipedia. All similar in nature. only notable part is TiVo Corporation. Light2021 (talk) 20:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Oppose - Not a valid merge rationale. Sergecross73 msg me 01:57, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Oppose merge. All Media Network is independently notable of Michael Erlewine per the sources I provided at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Media Network‎.

    Here is a source that demonstrates Erlewine is no longer involved with All Media Network so it does not make sense to merge it into his article.

    {{cite news |last=Nosowitz |first=Dan |date=2015-01-30 |title=The Story of AllMusic, Which Predates the World Wide Web |url=https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ypwezy/the-internets-most-complete-guide-to-music |newspaper=Vice |accessdate=2017-07-22 }}

    The article notes: "Today it is a backbone of the artistic internet. Every music critic and, I'd say, almost every music fan visits AllMusic regularly. Erlewine is no longer directly involved with AllMusic, the company having been sold a few times since the early 2000s."

    Cunard (talk) 05:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Oppose. Both subjects are notable, and each have sufficient material to merit freestanding articles. There is some overlapping history, but they are independent--I think readers are better served by keeping them separate. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

{{archive bottom}}