:Talk:Sarah Palin
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Round in circles|search=no}}
{{FAQ}}
{{Article history
|action1=GAN
|action1date=15:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
|action1link=Talk:Sarah Palin/GA1
|action1result=failed
|action1oldid=240908335
|action2=GAN
|action2date=04:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
|action2link=Talk:Sarah Palin/GA2
|action2result=failed
|action2oldid=667327384
|currentstatus=FGAN
|topic=Politics and government
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|blp=yes|class=C|listas=Palin, Sarah|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=high}}
{{WikiProject Alaska|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Beauty Pageants|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid|American=yes|American-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low|AZ=yes|AZ-importance=low|USgovernors=yes|USgovernors-importance=low|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=high|ID=Yes|ID-importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
}}
{{Press
| title= Wikipedia Edits Forecast Vice Presidential Picks
| author= Brian Krebs
| date= August 29, 2008
| url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/29/AR2008082902691.html
| org= The Washington Post
| title2= Palin's Wikipedia Entry Gets Overhaul
| author2= Yuki Noguchi
| date2= August 29, 2008
| url2= http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyid=94118849
| org2= NPR
| title3= Tug of war over Wiki entry on Palin
| author3= Chris O'Brien
| date3= August 29, 2008
| url3= http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_10338833
| org3= San Jose Mercury News
| title4= Sarah Palin Wikipedia edits--fast and furious
| author4= Natalie Weinstein
| date4= August 30, 2008
| url4= http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10029598-38.html
| org4= CNET News
| title5= Don’t Like Palin’s Wikipedia Story? Change It
| author5= Noam Cohen
| date5= September 1, 2008
| url5= http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/01/technology/01link.html
| org5= The New York Times
| url6= http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10029598-38.html
| org6= CNET News
| title7= Sarah Palin's immensely flattering Wikipedia entry
| author7= Jemima Kiss
| date7= September 1, 2008
| url7= http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/digitalcontent/2008/09/sarah_palins_immensely_flatter.html
| org7= The Guardian
| title8= Sarah Palin Wikipedia entry gets glowing make-over from mysterious user Young Trigg
| author8= Mike Harvey
| date8= September 1, 2008
| url8= http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4653971.ece
| org8= The Times
| title9= Wikipedia e la biografia “ripulita” di Sarah Palin
| author9= Roberto Reale
| date9= September 2, 2008
| url9= http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/rainews24_2007/magazine/scenari/scenari_estate_09.asp
| org9= RAI
| title10= Wikipedia war emerges over details about Palin
| author10= Mark Sabbatini
| date10= September 2, 2008
| url10= http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/090208/sta_326628504.shtml
| org10= Juneau Empire
| title11= Who scrubbed Palin clean?
| author11= Iain Simons
| date11= September 2, 2008
| url11= http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/culture-tech/2008/09/usa-vote-palin-wikipedia
| org11=New Statesman
| title12= The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin II: The Bridge To Nowhere
| author12= Andrew Sullivan
| date12= September 15, 2008
| url12=http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/the-lies-of-s-2.html
| org12=The Daily Dish
| title13= Sarah Palin winning the Wikipedia popularity contest
| author13= Stephanie Condon
| date13= September 17, 2008
| url13=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10044085-38.html
| org13=CNET News
| title14=Why Google's online encyclopedia will never be as good as Wikipedia
| date14=September 22, 2008
| url14=http://www.slate.com/id/2200401/
| org14=Slate
| author14=Farhad Manjool
| title15=Updating a Reference Site on the Fly
| author15=Noam Cohen
| date15=November 9, 2008
| url15=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/10/technology/internet/10link.html
| org15=The New York Times
| author16=(none)
| date16=August 17, 2009
| url16=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Wikipedia-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html
| title16=The 50 most-viewed Wikipedia articles in 2009 and 2008
| org16=The Daily Telegraph
| author17=Andy Miller
| title17=Welcome to Anchorpedia
| org17=Anchorage Press
| url17=https://www.anchoragepress.com/news/welcome-to-anchorpedia/article_ccfec22c-935e-55b7-b655-22d66ffdca3a.html
| date17=October 10, 2013
|author18 = Rhiannon Ruff
|title18 = Why Wikipedia can be a PR problem for political campaigns
|date18 = March 6, 2024
|org18 = PR Daily
|url18 = https://www.prdaily.com/why-wikipedia-can-be-a-pr-problem-for-political-campaigns/
|lang18 =
|quote18 =
|archiveurl18 =
|archivedate18 =
|accessdate18 = March 6, 2024
}}
{{Annual report|2008}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 65
|minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Sarah Palin/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Talk:Sarah Palin/Archive index
|mask=Talk:Sarah Palin/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}}
The first tea party convention was not in 2010
The first teaparty convention was held at Faneuil Hall Boston on December 16, 2007. What Sarah Palin attended was some GOP PAC The tea party the original one never did and still doesn’t endorse candidates it’s a movement not a political party and not a PAC and it is not the GOP when are people going to understand this? The 2010 event she attended was decidedly Republican. I formed the first tea party coalition in New Hampshire in 2007 so I should know. You can check out our website for references. nhteapartycoalition.org 2601:18D:8780:C9F0:8D49:CD4F:B493:B7E1 (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
:Do you mean [https://www.wbur.org/news/2007/12/17/paul-supporters-re-enact-tea-party this Ron Paul 2008 campaign event]? Because while that may have been a precursor to the Tea Party movement, it's not the Tea Party movement. It was Ron Paul's 2008 presidential campaign. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
2017 Defamation Lawsuit
The second circuit has ordered a new trial regarding the 2017 defamation lawsuit.
[https://apnews.com/article/sarah-palin-times-libel-b1e9e9ae91b1a52f28f03cab38ac3e7e] 50.173.198.218 (talk) 18:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Business insider is a Pulitzer Prize winning website. It says that Sarah Palin Probably Staged A Gigantic Hoax About Being Trig's Mother.
Why the wiki page on Sarah Palin wouldn't say a single word about this ?
https://www.businessinsider.com/sarah-palin-baby-hoax-2011-4 192.121.102.220 (talk) 07:48, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2025
{{edit semi-protected|Sarah Palin|answered=y}}
Current language:
She also opposes abortion, including in cases of rape, incest, and embryonic stem cell research, but supports it if the mother's life is in jeopardy. She supports parental consent as a requirement for female minors seeking an abortion.
Proposed language:
She opposes abortion, unless the mother's life is in jeopardy, and also opposes embryonic stem cell research. She supports parental consent as a requirement for minors seeking an abortion.
Reason for proposed change: current wording is confusing, implying that embryonic stem cell research is a reason to seek an abortion. 2601:6C1:102:D9E0:77E9:DC9F:907A:4361 (talk) 22:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
:{{done}} Agreed that the previous wording was confusing. I didn't adopt your exact suggestion, but I think I cleared up the ambiguity. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 18:11, 24 April 2025 (UTC)