:Template:Did you know nominations/2003 Melbourne runaway train

Category:Passed DYK nominations from February 2019

:The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

==2003 Melbourne runaway train==

{{DYK nompage links|nompage=2003 Melbourne runaway train|2003 Melbourne runaway train}}

... that the 2003 Melbourne runaway train avoided a disastrous collision by less than a second? Source: four parapgraphs, from "However, another stopping-all-stations train, number 5262, was ahead of the runaway and unaware of the danger" to "Later calculations showed that disaster had been averted by less than a second." (Calculation from ATSB report and cited in text)

Moved to mainspace by Triptothecottage (talk). Self-nominated at 03:22, 3 February 2019 (UTC).

:* 16px {{ping|Triptothecottage}} have you done QPQ or have you nominated less than 5 DYKs before so you are not required? Lenght and creation date are OK. Hook is cited and interesting. I would improve the structure of the article a bit, as the "Accident" section is very long. If it could be split somehow. Otherwise if QPQ is not required, it's good to go in my view. --Pudeo (talk) 22:26, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

::* {{re|Pudeo}} This is number 5. I'll split the Accident section now, thanks for the feedback there. Triptothecottage (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

:::*16px Good to go in my view then. The subsections help readability. --Pudeo (talk) 07:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)