:Template:Did you know nominations/Linckia multifora
{{#if:yes| :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page. The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 01:09, 30 September 2011 (UTC) {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Linckia multifora|Linckia multifora}} :*Reviewed: The Purple Piano Project Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 05:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC) {{DYK hook checklist | format = 16px Casliber (talk · contribs) | citation = 16px Casliber (talk · contribs) | neutrality = 16px Casliber (talk · contribs) | interest = 16px the fact about the snail parasite is interesting as well, and the picture of it inside it elswhere on the web is amazing. Casliber (talk · contribs) | alt = }} {{DYK article checklist | length = 16px Casliber (talk · contribs) | newness = 16px Casliber (talk · contribs) | adequatecitations = 16px Casliber (talk · contribs) | formattedcitations = 16px I fixed most. Casliber (talk · contribs) | reliablesources = 16px I replaced one blog with some better sources, the other blogs were better. Casliber (talk · contribs) | neutrality = 16px Casliber (talk · contribs) | plagiarism = 16px Casliber (talk · contribs) | article = }} :*Or perhaps more simply - Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC) ::*Me no like! That is too across-the-board...we want hook bait! :) Rcej (Robert) – talk 05:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC) :::* I think your hook is a bit lengthy and convoluted, so here is another try - Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC) ::::*Love it! Is it too "unencyclopedic"? Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC) :::::*lol...cute, but too loose with the terminology. Starfish have only arms; when have hooks ever inspired inaccuracy? Rcej (Robert) – talk 01:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC) How about: : :*That's okay too... Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC) ::*Um, that one also plays fast and loose with terminology. Asexual reproduction absolutely should not be piped to "sexual practices," because asexual reproduction is reproduction that does not involve sex. --Orlady (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2011 (UTC) :*Here's a new attempt: ::*ALT4: ... that the spotted Linckia (pictured) frequently reproduces by self amputating an arm, which then grows into a new individual? --Orlady (talk) 14:26, 28 September 2011 (UTC) :::16px Tickmark applies to ALT4. --Orlady (talk) 21:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC) ::::How about some hookable mystery: ::::*ALT5: ... that asexual reproduction of the spotted Linckia (pictured) includes self amputation? Rcej (Robert) – talk 07:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC) {{-}}{{#if:yes|
}}==Linckia multifora==
... that the spotted Linckia (pictured) self amputates its arms for the pieces to grow into new individuals so often that it is considered to be asexual reproduction?
ALT1 ... that the arms of the spotted Linckia (pictured) sometimes fall off and grow into new starfish?ALT2 ... that the spotted Linckia (pictured) will give an arm or a leg to start a family?ALT3: ... that the sexual practices of the spotted Linckia (pictured) include self amputation? Rcej (Robert) – talk 02:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
