:User talk:Drrngrvy

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Method_of_loci&curid=1684619&diff=39807413&oldid=39807301 lol] made me smile ··gracefool |☺ 01:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Viewing deleted content is limited to admins because some things that get removed could contain text that could cause the Foundation legal problems, or include personal information that was deleted for privacy reasons. Admins are generally considered to be responsible enough to deal with that sort of information in an appropriate manner. Non-admins used to be able to view the history page for deleted articles, so that they could see who had edited it and the edit summaries. Unfortunately, we started getting cases where personal information was being posted to edit summaries, so that functionality was turned off. If you are interested in the contents of Jamal Kelly, I can dump the article to your sandbox as none of the above problems existed with this article. --GraemeL ^(talk) 15:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

:That makes perfect sense. Cheers. But since I'm feeling curious, would you mind dumping that page on me? - Drrngrvy 15:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

::No problem. It's in User:Drrngrvy/Sandbox. --GraemeL ^(talk) 16:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

:::Much appreciated - Drrngrvy 16:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that... I saw a hmmmm on a user page and didn't think twice. --Chodorkovskiy ^(talk) 06:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi! I removed 'feck' from the list of fictional expletives as it is not fictional. You'll notice extensive discussion of the topic on the talk page of that article, including the info that it is a common word, used as an expletive, in Ireland. Thanks for the contribution and happy editing!--Anchoress 22:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unix_time&diff=prev&oldid=71415533 edit] for Unix time.

The duplicate links are Time (computing) and System time. The second one redirects to the first one, but I kept the second spelling because it sounds more relevant (obviously either one is correct). — Loadmaster 19:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip.

Lunchboxhero

Hi. declares std::cout, std::cerr, etc, while declares std::ostream. The header might include , but that's not guaranteed; there are a few compilers where this is not the case. Xerxesnine 14:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

:All of your questions are answered by a simple [http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=iostream+ostream+include&qt_s=Search google search]. Xerxesnine 15:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

If you think you got something intelligent to say about Scientology do it on the talk page and face the heat. Misou 23:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Asynchronous server query, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tl|dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — ^FatalError 23:20, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)