:User talk:FuzzyMagma#Proposed deletion of File:Synthesised Sudan album cover.webp

File:Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg

Hi FuzzyMagma, I just wanted to let you know that I have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AFuzzyMagma added] the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:Duh, you won’t be stressing me out any longer with your entries on the NPP feed :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

::Lol thanks brother FuzzyMagma (talk) 05:39, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Your recent edit on the 1954 Anglo-Egyptian evacuation agreement is inaccurate. The discussions were initiated by Egypt and the United Kingdom on 27 July 1954 but the treaty was finally SIGNED on 19 October 1951, making the agreement official. GloriousFigure (talk) 21:34, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:You cannot start the article by saying: {{tq|The 1954 Anglo–Egyptian evacuation Treaty ("Heads of Agreement") was signed on 27 July 1954}}, and then use a different date in the infobox. Just be consistent. If it was signed October then put October in the lead and infobox FuzzyMagma (talk) 05:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

::You cannot just keep making the same error. I made an error, I fixed it. If you put it 27 July 1954 again I will report you. Plus you said that I created the page myself so I made most of the research (perhaps more than you), so the information that I add is also verified. GloriousFigure (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

:::@GloriousFigure: This is not an appropriate or constructive way to engage in editorial discourse on Wikipedia. No editor "owns" the content they volunteer here, irrespective of whether they initiated the article or have made extensive contributions to it. What you are exhibiting is a textbook violation of WP:OWN, and it is precisely the kind of conduct that will create unnecessary friction in future editorial interactions if left unchecked.

:::The value of any contribution is determined solely by its adherence to Wikipedia’s core content policies, not by the credentials or personal convictions of the contributor. Assertions made without proper sourcing constitute original research and are inherently subject to removal under WP:OR, no matter how knowledgeable you believe yourself to be. Wikipedia does not operate on appeals to authority; it operates on verifiability and consensus.

:::Moreover, implying that another editor’s good-faith contributions warrant reporting simply because they engaged with material you disagree with is the worst form of WP:OWNBEHAVIOR and borders dangerously on WP:ASPERSION and is a deeply inappropriate interpretation of dispute resolution norms. If your edits are being challenged, the correct procedural recourse is to engage with the WP:BRD cycle and pursue constructive dialogue, not escalate with baseless threats of reporting, which will most likely just backfire on you due to this attitude. In this particular instance, the other user merely asked you to be consistent with whichever date is correct, so there's really no need for the sassiness.

:::I would also like to acknowledge and genuinely commend the articles you’ve created and the substantial depth you've brought to the coverage of Egyptian history. Your contributions in that regard are undeniably valuable. That said, I urge you not to let this important work be overshadowed by a counterproductive pattern of communication and unwillingness to listen and cooperate with other editors who share your interest in these topics. A collegial approach to dialogue goes a long way, even with those whose views may fundamentally diverge from your own.

:::I strongly encourage you to reconsider your approach if you wish to contribute meaningfully and effectively to this platform. Turnopoems 𓋹 ✎ 09:53, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, FuzzyMagma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muhammad Ahmad Abu Rannat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:09, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I did NOT use any LLM model for my draft and the citations are there I just didn’t overload them on one paragraph. Why did you reject my draft? 206.176.151.163 (talk) 16:06, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

:There are signs when LLM is used and your text fits all of them. More importantly, every sentence in the article need to be sources before I even attempt to go through the draft to evaluate if it is suitable for inclusion. Thus this was a quick rejection. This is not a comment on the importance of the topic but rather the quality if your work. Let me know if you need help to identify reliable sources. You can also use Help:Your first article. Happy editing. FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:14, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

::There are no signs of LLM. I didn’t use one at all, the citations were spaced out as to not overuse them for one section, so that is a very confusing response, LLM uses generic language, and wouldn’t go into specific detail like I did. Is there an admin I can talk to about this ? 206.176.151.163 (talk) 16:27, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

:::you can use WP:ANI if you have a complain, or go to WP:NPP for a 2nd opinion. FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Thanks so much for improving the page! I really appreciate it. 206.176.151.163 (talk) 16:47, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I have a lot of respect for your contributions and wanted to address a point I saw you make in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Seatile. On Wikipedia, PRODs can be declined for any reason or no reason at all; see WP:DEPROD. There doesn't ever have to be any improvement made to the page or even a P&G-based justification, anyone is allowed to remove the tag.

For Olympians from countries where systemic biases impact the amount of coverage available to us, it's generally better to let the process play itself through so that people have a week to find coverage. Ping me if you have any questions. Thanks, --Habst (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks Habst for your reply but I am sure you also understand why the PROD process is in place rather than AfD each and every article.

:Don't get me wrong, I see the value in what you do, and how you trying relentlessly to save these articles by continuing to improve them and you have saved few, but I am sure even you understand that some of these articles absolutely doesn’t meet notability criteria and sometimes the article doesn’t actually serve a unique purpose. I completely understand the argument for WP:Preserve but these need to stand on something.

:Nonetheless, I apologise if my comment upset you and sorry for putting you on the spot. You are right, according to policies you are entitled to declined each and every PROD.

:take care. FuzzyMagma (talk) 03:36, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::You are fine, I'm not upset by your comment at all and appreciate your work. The issue from my perspective is that there is no way to tell if an Olympian is notable without spending a week or two looking for sources. If there was a way to confirm that a topic is for sure not notable, I would not remove the PROD, but from my perspective there is no way to tell until the AfD runs its course. --Habst (talk) 15:32, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, do you want to support [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles/Level/5/Society#Add_Syrian_literature this nomination?] Thanks, Munfarid1 (talk) 20:20, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, how are you doing. I saw your amazing work every now and then. Stay healthy and take care FuzzyMagma (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for your support and continued interest. - As you might have seen, I have been writing about 19th-century photographers in Africa, a worthwhile field for me. This also gives me a chance to present their images in galleries w/out copyright issues. :) History provides some relief of contemporary depressing developments in our mistreated world. - Was happy to nominate poor Fatima Hassouna for DYK, however, that received 18.000 visits. - Hope you are enjoying life and your continued interests. Cheers, Munfarid1 (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:::may she rest in peace. I saw the nom and saw her work. An amazing life that was taken from this world.

:::You did great work, and uploaded some amazing images.

:::I am too focusing more in understanding how Sudan end-up here (again and again). But it is really depressing anywhere you look. Maybe I should try lighter topics.

:::On a positive note, I am looking for a cultural topic to tackle, so I would appreciate any recommendations. FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::You work actually led me to [https://www.spiegel.de/geschichte/deutsche-kolonialisten-das-zebroid-des-kaisers-geheimwaffe-a-260962e3-4350-4154-83ac-13f7201c233e this article] (lost track how I ended up there but started with Walther Dobbertin) and it is a really funny article. FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:45, 27 May 2025 (UTC)