:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acer Clear.fi
=[[Acer Clear.fi]]=
:{{la|Acer Clear.fi}} – (
:({{Find sources|Acer Clear.fi}})
Unremarkable product. Doesn't fall under A7. — Timneu22 · talk 15:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - One mention in a gadget blog (RS yes, the most reputable of RSes no) does not indicate notability. Rilak (talk) 07:37, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione ....... Leave a message 17:04, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per the significant coverage in reliable sources. See [http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=592379&publicationSubCategoryId=71 this article] from The Philippine Star, [http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20100531-272999/Acer-gets-to-firm-up-lead-with-new-devices this article] from the Philippine Daily Inquirer, [http://www.funddj.com/KMDJ/News/NewsViewer.aspx?a=9c837526-e7dc-4e44-98e0-27ccda45f58f this article] from funddj.com. These articles demonstrate that Acer Clear.fi passes Wikipedia:Notability. Cunard (talk) 07:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
:*These sources are in addition to [http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/197334/acer_turns_its_attention_to_the_living_room_with_clearfi.html this article] from PC World, which is already in the article. Notability is fully established. Cunard (talk) 07:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.