:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimee Allen

Nice thorough bio but questionable if it meets the criteria for inclusion as an encyclopedic article --Wotwu 06:05, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, looks like nn bio. feydey 06:10, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Almost certainly copyvio. See below. N Shar 06:16, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Part of it was copyvio, and that was removed. In it's place, there is a link to the original biography at http://www.artistdirect.com/nad/music/artist/bio/0,,1748450,00.html#bio. --Rob 08:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• The copyvio is gone, but it still seems to fail WP:MUSIC. N Shar 18:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- Rob 17:20, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:Bio, WP:Music -- SusanLarson [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SusanLarson&action=edit§ion=new New talk], Contribs) 19:26, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep She seems to just barely make it, but looks notable enough. Her album isn't very high at Amazon[http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00006JOCZ/qid=1137372624/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/002-7244289-3211260?s=music&v=glance&n=5174], but I'm not sure that's as good a judge on music.--T. Anthony 00:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC, and also has one of the main hallmarks of a non-notable musician: a myspace page. Stifle 23:50, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn bio Incognito 00:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.