:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analog Pussy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. howch e ng {chat} 07:23, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

=[[Analog_Pussy]]=

Vanity page. Behaviour 22:55, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

strong keep Buy their album at [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00004T01B/102-2559750-9071353?v=glance&n=5174 amazon.com] MNewnham
Keep Notable, I've heard of them on previous occasions, gets 42k results on Google Search 4 Lancer 25px 00:02, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Keep: appears to be many independent pages on the duo, but the article does need a rewrite to be more encyclopædic.—Stombs 05:47, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Keep: per Stombs ×Meegs 07:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
Why delete? 203.214.112.124 14:00, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Strong Keep. I'm a classical musician and I've heard of them. Somebody got over zealous here Musikfabrik 15:47, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Because every other band (most which are undeserving) gets a page. besides, analog pussy rocks! --Wallaby 12:56, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.