Login
Login

:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Bryant

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep but does it need to be moved to Edwin Bryant? FCYTravis 5 July 2005 21:49 (UTC)

=[[Edwin Bryant/Temp]]=

This only concerns the bottom portion. The top part of the entry about another person is up for copyvio.

The book covered has an Amazon sales rank of ~500k. No other claims of notability made.

lots of issues | [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lotsofissues&action=edit§ion=new leave me a message] 17:52, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete non notable, copyvio. JamesBurns 03:30, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Obviously. How can somebody seriously base a vfd on an Amazon sales rank? By the same logic, almost every writer before 1900 or in a specialised field (like for example Indology) would be non-notable. This is an author and editor of several important books in the specific field. See also for example: [http://indologica.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=496], [http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/ReligionTheology/Hinduism/?ci=0195169476&view=usa], Avecit 08:50, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • What a mess! This article comprises two entirely separate Edwin Bryants. The first is, indeed, a copyright violation (The museum's web site is not GFDL licenced.), and there is no prior non-infringing version of the article. By strict application of our copyright problems procedure, the entire article must go (there being no non-infringing version to roll back to), and the author of the second part of the article, on the second Edwin Bryant, should have been required to rewrite it from scratch in the rewrite article, which User:Lotsofissues should then have nominated for deletion (since xe wants it deleted). I've blanked the copyright violation article, started a rewrite article about the second Edwin Bryant using material from an Amazon search (rather than the original article), and shifted the VFD there. Uncle G 12:20, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)
  • This published author of three books and editor of a fourth appears to meet the WP:BIO criteria. Keep. Uncle G 12:25, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.