:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olwen Kelly

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Olwen Kelly]]=

:{{la|Olwen Kelly}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Olwen_Kelly Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Olwen Kelly}})

Trivial and unconvincing career with only 3 works so far and they aren't significant and that emphasizes it by the fact these said trivial works are her "best known" summarily, there's nothing fornpolicy-based notability. There's nothing to suggest otherwise as that would then be questioning our essential policies. SwisterTwister talk 22:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 01:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Delete or redirect to The Autopsy of Jane Doe, her only significant work to date. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 10:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.