:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Veliko Tarnovo
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Veliko Tarnovo}}|}}
__NOINDEX__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
==[[:Portal:Veliko Tarnovo]]==
:{{pagelinks|Portal:Veliko Tarnovo}}
Delete single town falls well short of the consensus for topic breadth/dedicated wikiproject that has been pretty consistently established over the last year-plus as necessary to justify a portal. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:18, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, clearly not a suitable topic for a portal. Spicy (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete seems ill-copied without attribution (based on source code) from a portal that was featured in 2005. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
I am making corrections!Can You take a look when I am finished? Thank You!Powerfox (talk) 21:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - This portal has only one article, and so could be subject to a P2, but we are here. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
I make dome correction from today and will systematize the other articles and I will connected the to the portal.Powerfox (talk) 15:53, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}