:Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey/Current tasks

• Turkish language to FA
• Turkish people to GA
• Turkish philosophy to Start

• There is a need for standardisation of same kind of articles; i.e. City articles have many different layouts, Biographies, Geographic places, cuisine related, music related also.
• We must have a definite layout for Provinces, another one for cities, another one for mountains, another one for ministries and so on.
• A sample Layout for Provinces; Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey/Current tasks/layout/province
• Comments and ideas needed. .

Tagging the talk pages of articles with {{tl|WPTR}} puts them in project scope and identifies them via various categories to the project.

• New articles - New articles that may be relevant to WikiProject Turkey should be reviewed daily and any new articles that are in project scope should be tagged.
• Data - Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey/New article announcements, updated by bot.
• Frequency - Daily
• Taskforce
• Task - Tag in-scope articles with {{WPTR|class=|importance=}}
• Result - Tagged articles appear in :Category:Unassessed Turkey articles and :Category:Unknown-importance Turkey articles and are kept track of by the project.
• Can be automated? - NO Collection of raw data is automated, but a human is needed to select which of these is in project scope.

• Turkey-stubs - These are articles tagged on the main page as a stub article related to Turkey. These should be brought into project scope.
• Data - :Category:Turkey stubs
• Frequency - Quarterly
• Taskforce
• Task - All the articles in this category should have {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}}
• Compare members of :Category:Turkey stubs with :Category:Stub-Class Turkey articles. For those articles in :Category:Turkey stubs, but not in :Category:Stub-Class Turkey articles:
• No talk page: create talk page with {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}}
• Talk page, without {{tl|WPTR}} and no {{tl|talkheader}}: prepend talk page with {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}}
• Talk page, without {{tl|WPTR}} but with {{tl|talkheader}}: insert {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}} after {{tl|talkheader}}
• Talk page, with {{tl|WPTR}}, but with no class assigned (present in :Category:Unassessed Turkey articles): update {{tl|WPTR}} with {{WPTR|class=Stub}}
• Talk page, with {{tl|WPTR}}, not present in :Category:Unassessed Turkey articles: examine article to see whether it is of stub quality. If so, re-rate to {{WPTR|class=Stub}} If not, remove stub tag from main page.
• Result - Turkey-stubs ranked as Stub-Class within WPTR, stubs that have progressed have stub-tags removed, Stub-Class articles wrongly classified as something else re-ranked to Stub-Class.
• Can be automated - YES All tasks aside from re-ranking either to Stub-Class or having main article stub tag removed can be automated.
• Last done: (Add date when this task was last carried out)
• Turkey-cuisine-stubs - These are articles tagged on the main page as a stub article related to cuisine of Turkey. These should be brought into project scope and also to the attention of Food and Drink Project
• Data - :Category:Turkish cuisine stubs
• Frequency - Quarterly
• Taskforce
• Task - All the articles in this category should have {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}} {{WikiProject Food and Drink}}
• Compare members of :Category:Turkish cuisine stubs with :Category:Stub-Class Turkey articles. For those articles in :Category:Turkish cuisine stubs, but not in :Category:Stub-Class Turkey articles:
• No talk page: create talk page with {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}} {{WikiProject Food and Drink}}
• Treatment of {{WikiProject Food and Drink}}: All pages in this category should be tagged with the template. Add all templates that are missing.
• Talk page, without {{tl|WPTR}} and no {{tl|talkheader}}: prepend talk page with {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}}
• Talk page, without {{tl|WPTR}} but with {{tl|talkheader}}: insert {{WPTR|class=Stub|importance=}} after {{tl|talkheader}}
• Talk page, with {{tl|WPTR}}, but with no class assigned (present in :Category:Unassessed Turkey articles): update {{tl|WPTR}} with {{WPTR|class=Stub}}
• Talk page, with {{tl|WPTR}}, not present in :Category:Unassessed Turkey articles: examine article to see whether it is of stub quality. If so, re-rate to {{WPTR|class=Stub}} If not, remove stub tag from main page.
• Result - Turkey-cuisine-stubs ranked as Stub-Class within WPTR, and made known to Food and Drink project, stubs that have progressed have stub-tags removed, Stub-Class articles wrongly classified as something else re-ranked to Stub-Class.
• Can be automated - YES All tasks aside from re-ranking either to Stub-Class or having main article stub tag removed can be automated.
• Last done: (Add date when this task was last carried out)

• Needed articles
• Please tag any redlink articles talk page with ;{{tl|WPTR}} , "class=Needed" . These links will be automatically listed under the category in above link.

• There is a short list for rivers; List of rivers of Turkey need to development.
• an article Rivers of Turkey we may need with short infos about rivers

• Islam in Turkey - A few copyedit, wikifying and finding references, could make into GA.
• Mountains of Turkey need to development.
• Lakes of Turkey created.
• Islands of Turkey created
• Peninsulas of Turkey created (as of Dec 6, 2009)
• Bays of Turkey created (as of Dec 3, 2009)
• TÜSİAD-KalDer National Quality Awards [http://www.tusiad.org/] for inclusion in List of national quality awards and :Category:Turkish awards. WP:RS might be found in Turkish business publications or college textbooks on subjects like Total quality management or Six Sigma (for example, {{OCLC|38475486}}).

Hi everybody,

could someone take a look at this little problem here? The thing is that some statistics about Muslim/Turkish(?) casualties are wrongly cited from sources, but now two editors are simply removing the category of Muslim casualties altogether, leaving only Greek and Armenian figures. I am not sure, but I feel this might even be done on purpose, the editors do not engage in discussion, so some help would be appreciated. Thank you, 82.217.116.224 (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

I managed to get a reprieve for this Turkish article into draftspace about a Turkish paper pulp company called MOPAK; however, I could not find enough RS to save it properly (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOPAK). There is very little on it in English websites. I was wondering if there are any Turkish editors who could take a look at it in draftspace and see if they can find some Turkish references that would help it meet WP:GNG? Otherwise, it will get deleted in draftspace. Or perhaps, Turkish editors might not consider it worth saving? Britishfinance (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Publicising this - Talk:Good Party#Political position - Rfc here, per WP:RFCTP. It really needs input from more editors. Please place your views on the linked talk page. Thanks. Helper201 (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

|}

|}