:en:User talk:M412k

In Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Government Warehouse you said that the original contents of Government Warehouse, before my later rewrite, were "not suitable for a Wikipedia article". {{user|Reddi}} has since restored those original unverifiable contents to the article, and then, when I removed them again, "in order to avoid an edit war" forked List of the Government Warehouse's contents. That latter has since been nominated for deletion, but currently there is just the one keep vote. {{user|Reddi}} has stated on Talk:Government Warehouse that if the latter article is deleted, xe intends to re-add the content to Government Warehouse once again. Please contribute to the discussions at Talk:Government Warehouse and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of the Government Warehouse's contents. Uncle G 13:20:33, 2005-08-10 (UTC)

{{User talk:ChaplineRVine/hello-alt}}

Come vote here please to decide this important matter! i trust that you'll make the right decision--Rictonilpog 17:24, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Just to let you know I reverted the article back to its non-copyright version. All three lines of it. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, M412k! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. froth^{T C} 07:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

The article on Orange County, Florida Sheriff Kevin Beary which you have previously edited has been nominated for deletion. Please feel free to share your thoughts on this matter. --TommyBoy 03:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning orange.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Killik, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{tl|dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

{{Invite User University of Central Florida}}--Scpmarlins (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year! As a user who has previously stated support for moving Press-up to "Push-up", I invite you to weigh in on the move discussion currently under way: Talk:Press-up#Requested_move_2. Clconway (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)