:user talk:Confusedmiked

ClockworkTroll 19:32, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Celebrity Rehab

Hi. Please see WP:Citing Sources#How to format and place citations for how to use ref tags to properly format sources as so that they appear in an article's References section. It also shows you how to use the ref name tag in order to cite a source multiple times, so that you don't have to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Celebrity_Rehab_with_Dr._Drew&action=historysubmit&diff=431313026&oldid=431277510 write it out four separate times].

In addition, it's not appropriate to add that material to the middle of the section on Reaction to the program, since the source does not make any mention of criticism or praise of the show, as this would violate WP:SYNTH. Conaway and Starr's deaths are already mentioned further down in the article, though I added the Guardian story to the passage about Conaway's passing, in order to mention the point about him being the second castmate to die this year. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

BP spill - your request

Hi, I'm a bit confused about your request re Marshall Islands and [http://dailyhurricane.com/2011/04/preliminary-deepwater-horizon-report-rips-transocean-marshall-islands.html this] ref. At this point, can you add it yourself? If not, tell me where you wanted the ref to go and I can add it. petrarchan47^T c 02:48, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

[[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]]

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes Theory

{{u|Jwslubbock}} asked if this was ready to go live, over the locked page; I looked over it and concurred, and I've just put it into place at Yes Theory.

I cut a pile of stuff that read more like a press release than a Wikipedia article - but it's still in the history, so the references and so on can be retrieved - David Gerard (talk) 18:07, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks David, much appreciated.

I was trying to ensure that it met the Wikipedia criteria for notability, as it has fallen foul if that criteria in the past.

Your help is much appreciated. I’m sure the Wikipedia community will help build it up in an appopriate manner.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

40px

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)