:user talk:JpGrB

H E L LØ

ŦH E R E

The big orange "you have new messages" banner was created for a reason. If you want my attention, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{TALKPAGENAMEE}}&action=edit§ion=new edit this page]. If I want your attention, I will edit your page. If I just want to reply out of politeness, I'll do it here and save interrupting whatever you're doing... if you're interested in what I said, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{TALKPAGENAMEE}}&action=watch watch this page] and find out. If I'm keen to see your response, I will be watching your talk page, or wherever I suspect you might post it. But if you have something to say you think I need to read, the big orange banner is kind of hard to miss...

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|algo = old(7d)

|archive = User talk:JpGrB/Archive 3

}}

I have archived the original postings from this page, and if you need to refer to them they can be located to the left. Please do not edit those pages, but create new discussions here.

Cuban Linx 2

How is it vandalism? It's encyclopedic and contains more confirmed fact and references than the previous article.

It just feels a little informal in terms of wording...the information doesn't really imply the timeline of how the album came about, so the events seem vague and unconnected. I (biased as I am, I mean I wrote the new version) kind of set out to be more specific and include more references. And I think the influences section is better, no 'fense.

Besides, the page has a cleanup banner and I notice you continually reformat every edit to fit your own standards...let other editors in!

I'm not trying to be a tyrant about this, but of all the edits I put in I think a lot of them possess much-needed information...instead of just reverting all of it we can work together to come up with a compromise. I felt the previous version was vague on certain things, some of the refs were '404 not found', and a lot of the wording could be updated; I was just trying to get your attention. I'm completely amenable to working to create a better overall article.

How's this?

My thing about that is that it seems from the later interview he acknowledges the overhaul by saying that stuff about needing to keep the formula 'for the fans.' It looks to me like his publicist or manager or whoever jumped the gun when he went on the record. Maybe Rae thought he could get Dre to produce the rest of the album or something.

Yeah, that looks pretty much good. Lean, accurate, etc. I didn't even know Bun B would be on the album, that should be heat

JR Writer

I found a good bio for him at http://music.aol.com/artist/jr-writer/biography/2211491. I think we could have a decent page if we included that as well as his discography.

RELAPSE: REFILL

Alright, So I'm editing the original message I posted.

http://www.dashadyspot.com/news/2009/11/19/relapse-refill-album-to-drop-in-december/

Sense you seem to be quite adroit in creating pages on Hip Hop events relating to Aftermath/Shady/G-Unit, think you might want to create a page based on that?

Hayes On Aftermath

We're never going to be at peace? Are we? You do realize that "MTV NEWS," is a Blog...Right?.

''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Horror/Saw task force|WikiProject Saw]]'' September 2009 Newsletter

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Horror/Saw task force/Outreach/Newsletter September 2009}}

Because You Left semi-protection

Hi there. I'm just letting you know I requested semi-protection for Because You Left at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Hope that solves the vandalism issue. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk