:user talk:UnitingChurches

AfD nomination of RChurch

I have nominated RChurch, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RChurch. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Thebluesharpdude (talk) 20:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi - I just noticed your question on the AfD talk page. Sorry no-one responded earlier, it isn't a place questions are normally asked. The main issue brought up by editors is notability which does require references, but not any old references. We're looking for an indication that RChurch is impactful or considered important to a significant population. This normally means things like: in depth coverage by several independent third party publishers with a reputation for authority, rigor, etc; receipt of a significant award; or third party evidence of a position of significant influence. Other evidence may also be suitable, this isn't an exhaustive list. Hope that's useful. If you have more questions, please feel free to leave a message at the bottom of my talk page. -- SiobhanHansa 17:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:RChurch Screen Shot.jpg]]

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The file :File:RChurch Screen Shot.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)