1937 Bengal Legislative Assembly election

The Government of India Act 1935 introduced significant constitutional reforms, aiming to grant greater self-governance to Indians under British colonial rule. Among its most notable provisions was the establishment of provincial autonomy, replacing the dyarchy introduced by the 1919 Act. Under the 1935 Act, Indian ministers were given full control over provincial portfolios, with the exception of defense, external affairs, and certain matters related to the Governor’s discretionary powers.{{Cite book |last=Coupland |first=Sir Reginald |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rxY4twEACAAJ |title=The Indian Problem: Report on the Constitutional Problem in India |date=1944 |publisher=Oxford University Press |language=en}}

In the Province of Bengal, the Act established a bicameral legislature, comprising the Legislative Assembly (lower house) and the Legislative Council (upper house). The Legislative Assembly consisted of 250 members, elected through a system of separate electorates that reflected the communal and socio-economic divisions in colonial Bengal. The electorate was limited and based largely on property, income, and education qualifications, which disproportionately favored landowners, urban elites, and business interests.{{Cite book |last=Chatterji |first=Joya |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/bengal-divided/9B7D8CFAD7BCB416739BF9B5553E02EE |title=Bengal Divided: Hindu Communalism and Partition, 1932–1947 |date=1994 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-52328-8 |series=Cambridge South Asian Studies |location=Cambridge |doi=10.1017/cbo9780511563256}}

The 250 seats in the Bengal Legislative Assembly were categorized into various communal and functional constituencies. These included seats reserved for Muslims, Hindus, Scheduled Castes (Depressed Classes), Europeans, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, landlords, commerce and industry, and universities. Of these, 117 seats were reserved for Muslims, 78 for Hindus, and 30 for Scheduled Castes, while the remaining were distributed among other interest-based categories.

The Act allowed Indian ministers to form cabinets and manage internal provincial affairs, provided they commanded the confidence of the majority in the Assembly. However, the Governor retained overriding authority in certain matters, including the power to dismiss ministries and veto legislation. This tension between Indian autonomy and colonial control remained a key political issue throughout the tenure of the provincial governments formed under the 1935 Act.{{Cite book |last=Sarkar |first=Sumit |title=Modern India, 1885 - 1947 |date=1992 |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=978-0-333-43806-0 |edition=Reprint. [der 2. ed. 1989] |series=Cambridge Commonwealth series |location=Basingstoke}}

The allocation of 250 seats in the assembly was based on the communal award. It is illustrated in the following.{{cite book |author=Sirajul Islam |year=2012 |chapter=Bengal Legislative Assembly |chapter-url=http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Bengal_Legislative_Assembly |editor1-last=Islam |editor1-first=Sirajul |editor1-link=Sirajul Islam |editor2-last=Jamal |editor2-first=Ahmed A. |title=Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh |edition=Second |publisher=Asiatic Society of Bangladesh}}

{{Div col|colwidth=22em}}

• General elected seats- 78
• Muslim electorate seats- 117
• Urban seats- 6
• Rural seats- 111
• Anglo-Indian electorate seats- 3
• European electorate seats- 11
• Indian Christian electorate seats- 2
• Zamindar seats- 5
• Labour representatives- 8
• Education seats- 2
• University of Calcutta- 1
• University of Dacca- 1
• Women seats- 5
• General electorate- 2
• Muslim electorate- 2
• Anglo-Indian electorate- 1
• Commerce, Industries and Planting seats- 19
• Port of Calcutta
• Port of Chittagong
• Bengal Chamber of Commerce
• Jute Interest
• Tea Interest
• Railways
• Traders Associations
• Others

{{div col end}}

{{Further|1937 Indian provincial elections}}The Indian National Congress emerged as the largest party overall with 52 seats, but it fell far short of a majority. The Krishak Praja Party (KPP) and Muslim League, both primarily Muslim-based parties, gained significant influence in the Muslim-majority constituencies. The Muslim League notably gained strength in urban Muslim areas, while the KPP, representing rural Muslim peasants, had success in rural constituencies. Despite the League winning fewer total seats than Congress, it secured a stronger presence in the reserved Muslim seats due to communal electorate divisions.{{Citation |last=Ali |first=Tariq Omar |title=6. Peasant Populism |date=2018-05-15 |work=A Local History of Global Capital |pages=137–167 |url=https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.23943/9781400889280-009/html |access-date=2025-07-03 |publisher=Princeton University Press |language=en |doi=10.23943/9781400889280-009 |isbn=978-1-4008-8928-0}}{{Election results

|party1=INC|seats1=54

|party8=Independent Muslims|seats8=42

|party2=AIML|seats2=40

|party9=Independent Hindus|seats9=37

|party3=KPP|seats3=35

|party5=Tripura Krishak Party|seats5=5

|party6=CNP|seats6=3

|party7=ABHM|seats7=2

|party4=CPI|seats4=32

}}

File:AK Fazlul Huq Cabinet 1937.jpg

Following the 1937 elections, no single party secured an outright majority in the 250-member Bengal Legislative Assembly. The Indian National Congress, although the largest single party with 52 seats, chose not to form a government in Bengal, partly due to its national policy of avoiding coalition governments in provinces where it lacked a clear majority.{{Cite book |last=Jalal |first=Ayesha |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/sole-spokesman/53629540A69011A6E2719E347AA80E91 |title=The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan |date=1985 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-45850-4 |series=Cambridge South Asian Studies |location=Cambridge |doi=10.1017/cbo9780511558856}}

Instead, A.K. Fazlul Huq, leader of the Krishak Praja Party (KPP), succeeded in forming a coalition ministry. The KPP had won 36 seats, mostly in rural Muslim constituencies. To secure a working majority, Huq entered into an alliance with the All-India Muslim League, which had won 39 seats, particularly from urban Muslim areas and elite Muslim voters. The coalition also included support from independent Muslim legislators, some Scheduled Caste leaders, and Hindu Mahasabha members. On April 1, 1937, Fazlul Huq was sworn in as the first Prime Minister of Bengal, under the provisions of the Government of India Act 1935

Despite initially cooperating with the Muslim League, Huq maintained a degree of independence from its central leadership, which led to increasing tension.{{Cite book |last=Jalal |first=Ayesha |title=Self and sovereignty: individual and community in South Asian Islam since 1850 |date=2005 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-22078-1 |edition=Digital print |location=London}} Huq prioritized regional and economic issues over communal ones, advocating land reforms and peasant welfare, often in opposition to the elite Muslim landlords who supported the League.

By 1941, the tensions had grown severe, and Huq broke away from the Muslim League. He later joined hands with the Hindu Mahasabha in a controversial move that further alienated both Muslim and Hindu hardliners.{{Cite book |last=Datta |first=Kalikinkar |title=History of the Freedom Movement in Bihar, Volume 2 |publisher=Government of Bihar |year=1957 |edition= |location=Bihar, India |publication-date=1957}}

The collapse of trust among coalition partners, widespread food shortages, inflation caused by World War II, and mounting communal tensions gradually eroded the legitimacy of Huq’s government. In March 1943, the Governor of Bengal, exercising his authority under the Government of India Act 1935, dismissed Huq’s ministry on grounds of political instability and loss of Assembly support. Huq’s dismissal marked the end of Bengal’s first elected provincial government.{{Cite book |url=https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520377370 |title=Congress and Indian Nationalism |date=2024-05-29 |publisher=University of California Press |doi=10.1525/9780520377370 |isbn=978-0-520-37737-0 |editor-last=Sisson |editor-first=Richard |editor-last2=Wolpert |editor-first2=Stanley}}

{{reflist}}

• Jahanara Begum: The Bengal Legislature of 1937 and Its Characteristics. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, Vol. 36 (1975), pp. 485–492 ([https://www.jstor.org/stable/44138871 online version at JSTOR])
• David Denis Taylor: Indian Politics and the Elections of 1937. D.Phil. thesis, University of London 1971. ProQuest Number: 11010433 ([https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/33670/1/11010433.pdf online version)]
• Shila Sen: Muslim Politics in Bengal 1937-47. Impex India: New Delhi, 1976 ([https://www.1947partitionarchive.org/node/344 online summary])

Category:1937 elections in India

Category:State Assembly elections in the Bengal Presidency