2000 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada
{{short description|none}}
{{overcolored|date=August 2023}}
The table below lists the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 2000. The table illustrates what reasons were filed by each justice in each case, and which justices joined each reason. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions.
Of the 65 judgments released in 2000, 9 were oral, and 42 were unanimous, and there were 4 motions.
Reasons
| class="wikitable" style="font-size:85%" |
| style="font-size:120%;"|Case name
! style="font-size:120%;"|Argued ! style="font-size:120%;"|Decided ! style="width:40px" | Lamer ! style="width:40px" | L'Heureux- ! style="width:40px" | Gonthier ! style="width:40px" | McLachlin ! style="width:40px" | Iacobucci ! style="width:40px" | Major ! style="width:40px" | Bastarache ! style="width:40px" | Binnie ! style="width:40px" | Arbour ! style="width:40px" | LeBel |
|---|
| style="width:200px" | Arsenault-Cameron v Prince Edward Island, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 3; 2000 SCC 1 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070107031317/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc1/2000scc1.html]
| November 4, 1999 | January 13, 2000 | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Kovach v British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 55; 2000 SCC 3 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070316232037/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc3/2000scc3.html]
| January 20, 2000 | January 20, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"|{{center|V}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | |
| style="width:200px" | Lindsay v Saskatchewan (Workers' Compensation Board), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 59; 2000 SCC 4 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115731/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc4/2000scc4.html]
| January 20, 2000 | January 20, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"|{{center|V}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Proulx, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 61; 2000 SCC 5 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080607135005/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc5/2000scc5.html]
| May 25, 26, 1999 | January 31, 2000 | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v LFW, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 132; 2000 SCC 6 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060725074321/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc6/2000scc6.html]
| May 25, 26, 1999 | January 31, 2000 | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v RNS, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 149; 2000 SCC 7 [https://web.archive.org/web/20101208112143/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc7/2000scc7.html]
| May 25, 26, 1999 | January 31, 2000 | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#00B2EE"|{{center|1}} | style="background:#00B2EE"|{{center|2}} | style="background:#00B2EE"|{{center|3}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00B2EE"|{{center|4}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v RAR, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 163; 2000 SCC 8 [https://web.archive.org/web/20101208114505/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc8/2000scc8.html]
| May 25, 26, 1999 | January 31, 2000 | style="background:red" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Bunn, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 183; 2000 SCC 9 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014111/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc9/2000scc9.html]
| May 25, 26, 1999 | January 31, 2000 | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:gray" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Wells, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 207; 2000 SCC 10 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060716152911/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc10/2000scc10.html]
| May 27, 1999 | February 17, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Brooks, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 237; 2000 SCC 11 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014223/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc11/2000scc11.html]
| October 8, 1999 | February 17, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#00B2EE"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="font-size:120%;"|Case name
! style="font-size:120%;"|Argued ! style="font-size:120%;"|Decided ! style="width:40px" | Lamer ! style="width:40px" | L'Heureux- ! style="width:40px" | Gonthier ! style="width:40px" | McLachlin ! style="width:40px" | Iacobucci ! style="width:40px" | Major ! style="width:40px" | Bastarache ! style="width:40px" | Binnie ! style="width:40px" | Arbour ! style="width:40px" | LeBel |
| style="width:200px" | Ingles v Tutkaluk Construction Ltd, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 298; 2000 SCC 12 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070316100818/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc12/2000scc12.html]
| October 8, 1999 | March 2, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Nanaimo (City of) v Rascal Trucking Ltd, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 342; 2000 SCC 13 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070312141509/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc13/2000scc13.html]
| November 3, 1999 | March 2, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Regina Police Assn Inc v. Regina (City of) Board of Police Commissioners, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 360; 2000 SCC 14 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080220215117/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc14/2000scc14.html]
| November 12, 1999 | March 2, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Biniaris, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 381; 2000 SCC 15 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014234/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc15/2000scc15.html]
| October 5, 6, 1999 | April 13, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Molodowic, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 420; 2000 SCC 16 [https://web.archive.org/web/20101208112056/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc16/2000scc16.html]
| October 5, 6, 1999 | April 13, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v AG, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 439; 2000 SCC 17 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014244/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc17/2000scc17.html]
| October 5, 6, 1999 | April 13, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#00B2EE"| | style="background:#79CDCD"| | style="background:#79CDCD"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Wust, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 455; 2000 SCC 18 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080216163140/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc18/2000scc18.html]
| November 9, 1999 | April 13, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Arthurs, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 481; 2000 SCC 19 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014254/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc19/2000scc19.html]
| November 9, 1999 | April 13, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Arrance, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 488; 2000 SCC 20 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014304/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc20/2000scc20.html]
| November 9, 1999 | April 13, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Global Securities Corp v British Columbia (Securities Commission), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 494; 2000 SCC 21 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318003649/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc21/2000scc21.html]
| January 25, 2000 | April 13, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="font-size:120%;"|Case name
! style="font-size:120%;"|Argued ! style="font-size:120%;"|Decided ! style="width:40px" | Lamer ! style="width:40px" | L'Heureux- ! style="width:40px" | Gonthier ! style="width:40px" | McLachlin ! style="width:40px" | Iacobucci ! style="width:40px" | Major ! style="width:40px" | Bastarache ! style="width:40px" | Binnie ! style="width:40px" | Arbour ! style="width:40px" | LeBel |
| style="width:200px" | R v GDB, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 520; 2000 SCC 22 [https://web.archive.org/web/20101208112344/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc22/2000scc22.html]
| January 28, 2000 | April 27, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | Ajax (Town of) v CAW, Local 222, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 538; 2000 SCC 23 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318003629/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc23/2000scc23.html]
| February 16, 2000 | April 27, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v Scalera, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 551; 2000 SCC 24 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115741/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc24/2000scc24.html]
| October 14, 1999 | May 3, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#00B2EE"| | style="background:#79CDCD"| | style="background:#79CDCD"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Sansalone v Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 627; 2000 SCC 25 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014314/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc25/2000scc25.html]
| October 14, 1999 | May 3, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#00B2EE"| | style="background:#79CDCD"| | style="background:#79CDCD"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Laflamme v Prudential-Bache Commodities Canada Ltd, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 638; 2000 SCC 26 [https://archive.today/20070317115832/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc26/2000scc26.html]
| November 2, 1999 | May 3, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v Montréal (City of); Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v Boisbriand (City of), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 665; 2000 SCC 27 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070316232048/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc27/2000scc27.html]
| November 8, 1999 | May 3, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Granovsky v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 703; 2000 SCC 28 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070318003712/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc28/2000scc28.html]
| November 10, 1999 | May 18, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Jolivet, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 751; 2000 SCC 29 [https://web.archive.org/web/20101208112127/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc29/2000scc29.html]
| February 19, 1999 | May 18, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:gray" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v ARB, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 781; 2000 SCC 30 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014325/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc30/2000scc30.html]
| June 13, 2000 | June 13, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"|{{center|V}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | Reference Re Firearms Act, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 783; 2000 SCC 31 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060715015617/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc31/2000scc31.html]
| February 21, 22, 2000 | June 15, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="font-size:120%;"|Case name
! style="font-size:120%;"|Argued ! style="font-size:120%;"|Decided ! style="width:40px" | Lamer ! style="width:40px" | L'Heureux- ! style="width:40px" | Gonthier ! style="width:40px" | McLachlin ! style="width:40px" | Iacobucci ! style="width:40px" | Major ! style="width:40px" | Bastarache ! style="width:40px" | Binnie ! style="width:40px" | Arbour ! style="width:40px" | LeBel |
| style="width:200px" | Reference re Gruenke, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 836; 2000 SCC 32 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080220215126/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc32/2000scc32.html]
| June 15, 2000 | June 15, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"|{{center|V}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | R v Cacheway, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 838; 2000 SCC 33 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070319014334/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc33/2000scc33.html]
| June 15, 2000 | June 15, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"|{{center|V}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | Friedmann Equity Developments Inc v Final Note Ltd, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 842; 2000 SCC 34 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060821013628/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc34/2000scc34.html]
| January 27, 2000 | July 20, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | |
| style="width:200px" | FN (Re), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 880; 2000 SCC 35 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070316232147/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc35/2000scc35.html]
| November 3, 1999 | July 20, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Will-Kare Paving & Contracting Ltd v Canada, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 915; 2000 SCC 36 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115821/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc36/2000scc36.html]
| November 10, 1999 | July 20, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Lovelace v Ontario, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 2000 SCC 37 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070317115852/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc37/2000scc37.html]
| December 7, 1999 | July 20, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Oickle, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 3; 2000 SCC 38 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070124022211/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc38/2000scc38.html]
| November 2, 1999 | September 29, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Morrisey, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 90; 2000 SCC 39 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060726084933/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc39/2000scc39.html]
| December 9, 1999 | September 29, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#79CDCD"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00B2EE"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Starr, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144; 2000 SCC 40 [https://web.archive.org/web/20090301163027/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc40/2000scc40.html]
| December 3, 1998/February 24, 2000 | September 29, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:red" |{{center|1}} | style="background:#EE9572"|{{center|1}} | style="background:red" |{{center|2}} | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#EE9572"|{{center|2}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | R v Caouette, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 271; 2000 SCC 41 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230149/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc41/2000scc41.html]
| October 4, 2000 | October 4, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"|{{center|V}} |
| style="font-size:120%;"|Case name
! style="font-size:120%;"|Argued ! style="font-size:120%;"|Decided ! style="width:40px" | Lamer ! style="width:40px" | L'Heureux- ! style="width:40px" | Gonthier ! style="width:40px" | McLachlin ! style="width:40px" | Iacobucci ! style="width:40px" | Major ! style="width:40px" | Bastarache ! style="width:40px" | Binnie ! style="width:40px" | Arbour ! style="width:40px" | LeBel |
| style="width:200px" | R v Hamelin, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 273; 2000 SCC 42 [https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc42/2000scc42.html]
| October 4, 2000 | October 4, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v DD, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 275; 2000 SCC 43 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070902074946/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc43/2000scc43.html]
| March 14, 2000 | October 5, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#CC99CC"| | style="background:#CC99CC"| | style="background:#B23AEE"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | |
| style="width:200px" | Blencoe v British Columbia (Human Rights Commission), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 307; 2000 SCC 44 [https://web.archive.org/web/20070824142649/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc44/2000scc44.html]
| January 24, 2000 | October 5, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#CC99CC"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#CC99CC"| | style="background:#CC99CC"| | style="background:#B23AEE"| |
| style="width:200px" | Public School Boards' Assn of Alberta v Alberta (AG), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 409; 2000 SCC 45 [https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc45/2000scc45.html]
| March 21, 22, 2000 | October 6, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | R v Darrach, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 443; 2000 SCC 46 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230200/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc46/2000scc46.html]
| February 23, 2000 | October 12, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | R v Lévesque, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 487; 2000 SCC 47 [https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc47/2000scc47.html]
| March 23, 2000 | October 12, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:white" | |
| style="width:200px" | Winnipeg Child and Family Services v KLW, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 519; 2000 SCC 48 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060716152923/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc48/2000scc48.html]
| February 25, 2000 | October 13, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:white" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v MO, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 594; 2000 SCC 49 [https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc49/2000scc49.html]
| October 13, 2000 | October 13, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"|{{center|V}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | R v Sutton, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 595; 2000 SCC 50 [https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc50/2000scc50.html]
| October 6, 2000 | November 9, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | R v J-LJ, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 600; 2000 SCC 51 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060716152935/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc51/2000scc51.html]
| December 10, 1999 | November 9, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="font-size:120%;"|Case name
! style="font-size:120%;"|Argued ! style="font-size:120%;"|Decided ! style="width:40px" | Lamer ! style="width:40px" | L'Heureux- ! style="width:40px" | Gonthier ! style="width:40px" | McLachlin ! style="width:40px" | Iacobucci ! style="width:40px" | Major ! style="width:40px" | Bastarache ! style="width:40px" | Binnie ! style="width:40px" | Arbour ! style="width:40px" | LeBel |
| style="width:200px" | Musqueam Indian Band v Glass, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 633; 2000 SCC 52 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071114165832/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc52/2000scc52.html]
| June 12, 2000 | November 9, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00B2EE"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | R v Charlebois, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 674; 2000 SCC 53 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230206/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc53/2000scc53.html]
| April 13, 2000 | November 10, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | R v Beauchamp, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 720; 2000 SCC 54 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230209/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc54/2000scc54.html]
| December 8, 1999 | November 10, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Russell, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 731; 2000 SCC 55 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060716033331/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc55/2000scc55.html]
| November 5, 1999 | November 10, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Avetysan, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 745; 2000 SCC 56 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230215/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc56/2000scc56.html]
| January 28, 2000 | November 10, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | R v Knoblauch, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 780; 2000 SCC 58 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060726204037/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc58/2000scc58.html]
| April 17, 2000 | November 16, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#EE9572"|{{center|2}} | style="background:#EE9572"|{{center|2}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:red" |{{center|1}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:red" |{{center|2}} | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | Martel Building Ltd v Canada, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 860; 2000 SCC 60 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080419072228/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html]
| February 17, 2000 | November 30, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | |
| style="width:200px" | R v Simard, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 911; 2000 SCC 61 [https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc61/2000scc61.html]
| December 5, 2000 | December 5, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"|{{center|V}} | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| |
| style="width:200px" | Syndicat de l'enseignement du Grand-Portage v Morency, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 913; 2000 SCC 62 [https://archive.today/20070620154231/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc62/2000scc62.html]
| December 11, 2000 | December 11, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"|{{center|V}} |
| style="width:200px" | Pacific National Investments Ltd v Victoria (City of), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 919; 2000 SCC 64 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080411092739/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc64/2000scc64.html]
| May 25, 2000 | December 14, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:red" | | style="background:#EE9572"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| |
| style="font-size:120%;"|Case name
! style="font-size:120%;"|Argued ! style="font-size:120%;"|Decided ! style="width:40px" | Lamer ! style="width:40px" | L'Heureux- ! style="width:40px" | Gonthier ! style="width:40px" | McLachlin ! style="width:40px" | Iacobucci ! style="width:40px" | Major ! style="width:40px" | Bastarache ! style="width:40px" | Binnie ! style="width:40px" | Arbour ! style="width:40px" | LeBel |
| style="width:200px" | R v Araujo, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 992; 2000 SCC 65 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230221/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc65/2000scc65.html]
| April 11, 12, 2000 | December 14, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| |
| style="width:200px" | Free World Trust v Électro Santé Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1024; 2000 SCC 66 [https://web.archive.org/web/20071222075127/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc66/2000scc66.html]
| December 14, 1999 | December 15, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1067; 2000 SCC 67 [https://web.archive.org/web/20060725202230/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc67/2000scc67.html]
| December 14, 1999 | December 15, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Whirlpool Corp v Maytag Corp, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1116; 2000 SCC 68 [https://web.archive.org/web/20090324041627/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc68/2000scc68.html]
| December 14, 1999 | December 15, 2000 | style="background:white" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:white" | | style="background:gray" | |
| style="width:200px" | Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v Canada (Minister of Justice), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1120; 2000 SCC 69 [https://web.archive.org/web/20061229121728/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2000/2000scc69/2000scc69.html]
| March 16, 2000 | December 15, 2000 | style="background:gray" | | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#B23AEE"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#93DB70"| | style="background:#00cd00"| | style="background:#CC99CC"| | style="background:#CC99CC"| |
Justices of the Supreme Court
| width=100% cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;" |
| style="background:#DDDDDD"| Justice
! style="background:#DDDDDD"| Reasons written ! style="background:#DDDDDD"| Votes cast ! style="background:#DDDDDD"| % Majority |
|---|
| style="font-size:85%" | Chief Justice Antonio Lamer (retired January 6, 2000)
| {| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|4
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=05 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|1
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=01 |
| align=center|5 of 6 (83.33%)
|-
| style="font-size:85%" | Puisne Justice Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|4
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=08 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|39
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|4 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=44 |
| align=center|45 of 52 (86.54%)
|-
| style="font-size:85%" | Puisne Justice Charles Gonthier
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|5
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=06 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|40
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|3 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=45 |
| align=center|47 of 51 (92.16%)
|-
| style="font-size:85%" | Puisne Justice Beverley McLachlin
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|10
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=14 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|39
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|3 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=44 |
| align=center|52 of 58 (89.66%)
|-
| style="font-size:85%" | Puisne Justice Frank Iacobucci
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|38
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |3 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=42 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|9
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=13 |
| align=center|49 of 55 (89.09%)
|-
| style="font-size:85%" | Puisne Justice John C. Major
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|8
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=09 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|43
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=46 |
| align=center|53 of 55 (96.36%)
|-
| style="font-size:85%" | Pusine Justice Michel Bastarache
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|7
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |5 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=14 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|46
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=50 |
| align=center|57 of 64 (89.06%)
|-
| style="font-size:85%" | Puisne Justice Ian Binnie
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|8
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=10 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|42
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|3 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=46 |
| align=center|51 of 56 (91.07%)
|-
| style="font-size:85%" | Pusine Justice Louise Arbour (appointed September 15, 1999)
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|8
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |3 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=12 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|31
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|2 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=35 |
| align=center|40 of 47 (85.11%)
|-
| style="font-size:85%" | Pusine Justice Louis LeBel (appointed January 7, 2000)
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00CD00"|4
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#00B2EE"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#B23AEE"|1 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:red" |0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=05 |
|
| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" align="center" width=100% |
| style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#93DB70"|17
| style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#79CDCD"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#CC99CC"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:19%;text-align:center;background:#EE9572"|0 | style="width:1%;background:gray" | | style="width:20%; text-align:center" |Total=17 |
| align=center|21 of 22 (95.45%)
|-
| colspan=5 style="font-size:85%" | This
Notes on statistics:
- A justice is only included in the majority if they have joined or concurred in the Court's judgment in full. Percentages are based only on the cases in which a justice participated, and are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
|}
Table key
{{SCCOpinionKey}}