2010 Swiss referendums#November

{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}}

{{Politics of Switzerland}}

{{short description|National referendums held in Switzerland in 2010}}

Six referendums were held in Switzerland during 2010; three in March on pension funds, animal protection and a constitutional amendment, one in September on unemployment benefits, and two in November on deporting foreign criminals and introducing a canton tax.

Results

=March=

Voters approved Provision 1, an amendment to the constitution on research on humans.

class=wikitable style=text-align:right
rowspan=2|Choice

!rowspan=2|Votes

!rowspan=2|%

!colspan=3|Cantons

Full

!Half

!Total

align=left|For1,708,48877.2120623
align=left|Against504,16722.79000
align=left|Invalid/blank votes84,893
align=left|Total2,297,54810020623
align=left|Registered voters/turnout5,051,16945.49
style="text-align:left;" colspan="6"|Source[http://www.sudd.ch/event.php?lang=en&id=ch012010 Direct Democracy]

Voters rejected Provision 2, a federal decree on providing enhanced legal protection for animals.

class=wikitable style=text-align:right
rowspan=2|Choice

!rowspan=2|Votes

!rowspan=2|%

!colspan=3|Cantons

Full

!Half

!Total

align=left|For671,73129.50000
align=left|Against1,605,14170.5020623
align=left|Invalid/blank votes37,618
align=left|Total2,314,49010020623
align=left|Registered voters/turnout5,051,16945.82
style="text-align:left;" colspan="6"|Source[http://www.sudd.ch/event.php?lang=en&id=ch022010 Direct Democracy]

Voters also rejected Provision 3, a federal law which would change the minimum conversion rate for occupational and disability pension plans.[http://www.electionguide.org/results.php?ID=1838 Election Profile] IFES

class=wikitable style=text-align:right
Choice

!Votes

!%

align=left|For617,20927.27
align=left|Against1,646,36972.73
align=left|Invalid/blank votes47,474
align=left|Total2,311,052100
align=left|Registered voters/turnout5,051,16945.75
style="text-align:left;" colspan="3"|Source[http://www.sudd.ch/event.php?lang=en&id=ch032010 Direct Democracy]

=September=

The referendum held on 26 September had a single topic, namely the revision of unemployment benefits. The centre and right-wing parties were in favour of the revision, which was undertaken to reduce the debt of the ALV, while the left-wing parties were against it.[http://www.vimentis.ch/d/publikation/188/Abstimmung+26.09.2010%3A+Revision+der+Arbeitslosenversicherung.html Abstimmung 26.09.2010: Revision der Arbeitslosenversicherung] Vimentis

The referendum was approved by 53.4% of voters, although only the German-speaking cantons (all of them except Basel-Stadt, which was against it with 50.4%) approved it.[http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/schweiz/sanierung_arbeitslosenversicherung_1.7689573.html Deutschschweizer Stimmvolk bringt den Durchbruch] NZZ, 26 September 2010[http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/schweiz/roestigraben_beim_abstimmungsresultat_1.7705277.html Und wieder klafft der Röstigraben] NZZ, 27 September 2010

class=wikitable style=text-align:right
Choice

!Votes

!%

align=left|For958,91353.42
align=left|Against836,10146.58
align=left|Invalid/blank votes24,463
align=left|Total1,819,477100
align=left|Registered voters/turnout5,077,18035.84
style="text-align:left;" colspan="3"|Source[http://www.sudd.ch/event.php?lang=en&id=ch042010 Direct Democracy]

=November=

The referendum held on 28 November had two issues:

{{anchor|Ausschaffungsinitiative}}

  • «Für die Ausschaffung krimineller Ausländer» ("For the deportation of criminal foreigners"), proposed by the Swiss People's Party, as well as a counterproposal by the other partes; and
  • «Steuergerechtigkeits-Initiative» ("Taxation justice initiative") for higher taxes on high incomes and property as well as the introduction of a minimum cantonal tax.[http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/schweiz/eidgenoessische_abstimmung_vom_28_november_2010_2.46954 Eidgenössische Abstimmung vom 28. November 2010] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101027181801/http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/schweiz/eidgenoessische_abstimmung_vom_28_november_2010_2.46954 |date=27 October 2010 }} NZZ

The SVP's federal popular initiative on deportation was accepted with 52.2% and a majority of cantons in favour, while the counterproposal failed with only 44.5% in favour. Whilst it was not required, the tie-breaker showed a majority of voters against but a majority of cantons for. On 28 February 2016, a follow-up initiative, also launched by the SVP, was rejected by voters.{{cite web|last=Raaflaub |first=Christian |url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/-initiative_literal-implementation-causes-controversy/41863564 |title=Deportation initiative back before voters - SWI |website=Swissinfo.ch |date=6 January 2016 |access-date=5 March 2016}}{{cite web|last=Stephens |first=Thomas |url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/february-28-vote_fate-of-foreign-criminals-hangs-in-voters--hands/41984634 |title=Swiss voters reject hardline initiative on criminal foreigners - SWI |website=Swissinfo.ch |date=28 February 2016 |access-date=5 March 2016}}{{cite web | title=Foreign Criminal Expulsion Law Set for October | url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/2010-initiative_foreign-criminal-expulsion-law-set-for-october/42001678 | date=4 March 2016 | website=Swissinfo | access-date=5 March 2016}} The deportation initiative went in effect on 1 October 2016.

class=wikitable style=text-align:right
rowspan=3|Question

!colspan=5|For

!colspan=5|Against

!colspan=2|Blank

!rowspan=3|Invalid
votes

!rowspan=3|Total

!rowspan=3|Registered
voters

!rowspan=3|Turnout

rowspan=2|Votes

!rowspan=2|%

!colspan=3|Cantons

!rowspan=2|Votes

!rowspan=2|%

!colspan=3|Cantons

!rowspan=2|Votes

!rowspan=2|%

Full

!Half

!Total

!Full

!Half

!Total

align=left|Proposal1,397,92352.2615517.51,243,94246.51515.532,7621.2316,1722,690,7995,084,05352.93
align=left|Counter-proposal1,189,26944.460001,407,83052.642062377,5282.9016,1722,690,7995,084,05352.93
style="text-align:left;" colspan="17"|Source[http://www.sudd.ch/event.php?lang=en&id=ch052010 Direct Democracy]

class=wikitable style=text-align:right

!colspan=6|Tie-breaker

rowspan=2|Choice

!rowspan=2|Votes

!rowspan=2|%

!colspan=3|Cantons

Full

!Half

!Total

align=left|Proposal1,252,76146.8413415
align=left|Counter-proposal1,271,36547.53728
align=left|Blank150,5015.63
align=left|Invalid votes16,172
align=left|Total2,690,79910020323
align=left|Registered voters/turnout5'084'05352.93
style="text-align:left;" colspan="6"|Source: [http://www.sudd.ch/event.php?lang=en&id=ch052010 Direct Democracy]

The taxation initiative failed with only 41.5% in favour.

class=wikitable style=text-align:right
rowspan=2|Choice

!rowspan=2|Votes

!rowspan=2|%

!colspan=3|Cantons

Full

!Half

!Total

align=left|For1,073,22941.54313.5
align=left|Against1,510,58958.4617519.5
align=left|Invalid/blank votes78,292
align=left|Total2,662,11010020623
align=left|Registered voters/turnout5,084,05352.36
style="text-align:left;" colspan="6"|Source[http://www.sudd.ch/event.php?lang=en&id=ch062010 Direct Democracy]

Withdrawn

In August 2010, family members of a murder victim launched another constitutional amendment initiative to provide for capital punishment in cases of murder combined with sexual violence.{{citation needed|date=October 2018}} The initiative quickly found itself at the center of public attention and was roundly rejected by political leaders; it was withdrawn a day after its official publication.{{cite news|title=Death penalty initiative is withdrawn|url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss_news/Death_penalty_initiative_is_withdrawn.html?cid=26670404|access-date=25 August 2010|newspaper=swissinfo|date=25 August 2010}}

References