AB magnitude

The AB magnitude system is an astronomical magnitude system. Unlike many other magnitude systems, it is based on flux measurements that are calibrated in absolute units, namely spectral flux densities.

Definition

The monochromatic AB magnitude is defined as the logarithm of a spectral flux density with the usual scaling of astronomical magnitudes and a zero-point of about {{val|3631|fmt=gaps}} janskys (symbol Jy),{{cite journal |last=Oke |first=J. B. |date=1983 |title=Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |volume=266 |pages=713–717 |bibcode=1983ApJ...266..713O |doi=10.1086/160817 }} where 1 Jy = {{nowrap|10⁻²⁶ W Hz⁻¹ m⁻²}} = {{nowrap|10⁻²³ erg s⁻¹ Hz⁻¹ cm⁻²}} ("about" because the true definition of the zero point is based on magnitudes as shown below). If the spectral flux density is denoted {{math|f_ν}}, the monochromatic AB magnitude is:

$m_\text{AB} \approx -2.5 \log_{10} \left(\frac{f_{\nu}}{\mathrm{3631\,Jy}}\right),$

or, with {{math|f_ν}} still in janskys,

$m_\text{AB} = -2.5 \log_{10} f_{\nu} + 8.90.$

The exact definition is stated relative to the cgs units of {{nowrap|erg s⁻¹ cm⁻² Hz⁻¹}}:

$m_\text{AB} = -2.5 \log_{10} f_{\nu} - 48.60.$

Inverting this leads to the true definition of the numerical value "{{val|3631|u=Jy|fmt=}}" often cited:

$f_{\nu,0} = 10^{\tfrac{48.60}{-2.5}} \approx 3.631 \times 10^{-20} \mathrm{erg \, s^{-1} \, {cm}^{-2} \, {Hz}^{-1}}$

Actual measurements are always made across some continuous range of wavelengths. The bandpass AB magnitude is defined so that the zero point corresponds to a bandpass-averaged spectral flux density of about {{val|3631|u=Jy|fmt=gaps}}:

$m_\text{AB} \approx -2.5 \log_{10} \left(\frac{\int f_\nu {(h\nu)}^{-1} e(\nu)\, \mathrm{d}\nu}{\int \mathrm{3631 \, Jy} \, {(h\nu)}^{-1} e(\nu) \, \mathrm{d}\nu}\right),$

where {{math|e(ν)}} is the "equal-energy" filter response function and the {{math|(hν)⁻¹}} term assumes that the detector is a photon-counting device such as a CCD or photomultiplier.{{cite journal |last=Tonry |first=J. L. |date=2012 |title=The Pan-STARRS1 Photometric System |journal=The Astrophysical Journal |volume=750 |issue=2 |pages=99 |bibcode=2012ApJ...750...99T |doi=10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/99 |arxiv = 1203.0297 |s2cid=119266289 }} (Filter responses are sometimes expressed as quantum efficiencies, that is, in terms of their response per photon, rather than per unit energy. In those cases the {{math|(hν)⁻¹}} term has been folded into the definition of {{math|e(ν)}} and should not be included.)

The STMAG system is similarly defined, but for constant flux per unit wavelength interval instead.

AB stands for "absolute" in the sense that no relative reference object is used (unlike using Vega as a baseline object).{{cite journal |last=Oke |first=J. B. |date=1974 |title=Absolute spectral energy distributions for white dwarfs |journal=Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series |volume=236 |issue=27|pages=21–25 |bibcode=1974ApJS...27...21O |doi = 10.1086/190287 }} This must not be confused with absolute magnitude in the sense of the apparent brightness of an object if seen from a distance of 10 parsecs.

Expression in terms of {{math|''f<sub>λ</sub>''}}

In some fields, spectral flux densities are expressed per unit wavelength, {{math|f_λ}}, rather than per unit frequency, {{math|f_ν}}. At any specific wavelength,

$f_\nu = \frac{\lambda^2}{c} f_\lambda,$

where {{math|f_ν}} is measured per frequency (say, in hertz), and {{math|f_λ}} is measured per wavelength (say, in centimeters). If the wavelength unit is ångströms,

$\frac{f_\nu}{\text{Jy}} = 3.34 \times 10^4 \left(\frac{\lambda}{\AA}\right)^2 \frac{f_\lambda}{\mathrm{erg \, {cm}^{-2} \, s^{-1} \, \AA^{-1}}}.$

This can then be plugged into the equations above.

The "pivot wavelength" of a given bandpass is the value of {{math|λ}} that makes the above conversion exact for observations made in that bandpass. For an equal-energy response function as defined above, it is {{cite journal|last=Tokunaga|first=A. T.|author2=Vacca|title=The Mauna Kea Observatories Near-Infrared Filter Set. III. Isophotal Wavelengths and Absolute Calibration|journal=Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific |date=April 2005|volume=117|issue=830|pages=421–426|doi=10.1086/429382|arxiv = astro-ph/0502120 |bibcode = 2005PASP..117..421T |s2cid=250813406 }}

$\lambda_\text{piv} = \sqrt{\frac{\int e(\lambda) \lambda\, \mathrm{d}\lambda}{\int e(\lambda) \lambda^{-1}\, \mathrm{d}\lambda}}.$

For a response function expressed in the quantum-efficiency convention, it is:

$\lambda_\text{piv} = \sqrt{\frac{\int e(\lambda)\, \mathrm{d}\lambda}{\int e(\lambda) \lambda^{-2}\, \mathrm{d}\lambda}}.$

Conversion from other magnitude systems

Magnitudes in the AB system can be converted to other systems. However, because all magnitude systems involve integration of some assumed source spectrum over some assumed passband, such conversions are not necessarily trivial to calculate, and precise conversions depend on the actual bandpass of the observations in question. Various authors have computed conversions for standard situations.{{cite journal |last=Blanton |first=M. R. |date=2007 |title=K-Corrections and Filter Transformations in the Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-Infrared |journal=The Astronomical Journal |volume=133 |issue=2|pages=734–754 |bibcode=2007AJ....133..734B |doi=10.1086/510127 |arxiv = astro-ph/0606170 |s2cid=18561804 }}

References

External links

[https://archive.today/20121204144725/http://www.astro.utoronto.ca/~patton/astro/mags.html#conversions#conversions Conversion from AB magnitudes to Johnson magnitudes]

{{Portal bar|Astronomy|Stars|Spaceflight|Outer space|Solar System}}

Category:Observational astronomy